Commons:Propositions d'images remarquables

Cette page du projet dans d’autres langues :

Les règles des Propositions d'images remarquables ont changé.
Conformément aux règles générales, une image est promue avec 7 (sept) votes "support" ou plus (et un ratio de 2/1 de # supports/opposes) et le nombre de nominations actives par utilisateur est limité à 2 (deux)
Désormais, seuls peuvent voter les membres inscrits depuis plus de 10 jours ayant procédé à au moins 50 interventions dans "Commons"

Aller directement aux propositions en cours

Cette page recense les images qui sont proposées pour être affichées dans les Images remarquables. Notez qu'il ne s'agit pas de la même chose que l'image du jour ou que les images de qualité.

Les archives des votes précédents se trouvent sur cette page.

Il existe également une liste chronologique des images remarquables.

Voir aussi les Images de qualité, les propositions d'images de qualité et les critiques photographiques.

Procédure

Conseils avant de proposer une image

partie en cours de traduction depuis la version anglaise, votre avis est le bienvenu.

Lisez entièrement le guide avant de commencer

Quelques règles informelles à retenir avant de proposer une image (les termes en italiques sont la traduction anglaise des termes).

Définition (display resolution) : les images de Commons peuvent être utilisées sur d'autres supports qu'un écran d'ordinateur, par exemple pour être imprimées ou vues à très haute résolution. Il est important que les images proposées aient la plus haute résolution possible. Au moins 2 millions de pixels (par ex. 2000 x 1000) semble raisonnable à présent. Les images de définition inférieure sont systématiquement rejetées sauf s'il y a une bonne raison.
Mise au point (focus) : tous les objets importants de l'image devraient être nets. Dans l'idéal les objets non primordiaux sont nets.
Avant-plan et arrière-plan (background and foreground): ils peuvent être dérangeants. Le sujet principal ne devrait pas être caché par le premier plan, ni se confondre avec l'arrière-plan.
Qualité générale (general quality) : Les images proposées devraient avoir une très haute qualité technique.
Une retouche (digital manipulations) ne doit pas tromper l'observateur. La correction de quelques défauts dans l'image est acceptée pour autant que ce soit limité, bien fait, et non pour tromper. Les retouches courantes sont le recadrage, la correction de la perspective, de netteté, des couleurs ou de l'exposition. Des manipulations plus importantes, tels quel l'élimination d'éléments dans l'arrière plan, doivent être décrites dans la description de l'image, par le biais du modèle {{RetouchedPicture}}. Les retouches non décrites ou mal décrites qui transformeraient le sujet sont inacceptables.
Utilité (value) : notre but principal est de présenter des images utiles et précieuses. Les images devraient ainsi être spéciales d'une façon ou d'une autre, donc, entre autres :
- La plupart des coucher de soleil sont beaux, et la plupart ne sont pas différents des autres existant déjà.
- Les photos de nuit sont souvent belles mais davantage de détails sont visibles de jour.
- "Beau" ne veut pas dire "utile".

Au niveau technique, nous avons l'exposition, la composition, le mouvement et la profondeur du champ.

L'exposition (exposure) est l'obturation du diaphragme qui modifie la luminosité (brightness) pour rendre avec qualité les ombres et les lumières au sein de l'image. Le manque d'ombres dans le détail n'est pas nécessairement négatif, cela peut être un effet désiré.
La composition (composition) est l'arrangement des éléments dans l'image. La "Règle de trois" est un bon guide pour la composition, c'est un héritage des écoles de peintures. L'idée est de diviser l'image par deux lignes horizontales et deux lignes verticales, nous avons donc trois parties dans chaque sens. L'objet ne doit pas forcément être centré. Les sujets intéressants doivent êtres placés aux 4 croisements des lignes. L'horizon ne doit jamais être mis au milieu, car il couperait l'image en deux. L'idée principale ici est de rendre l'image dynamique.
Netteté (sharpness) renvoie à la manière dont les mouvements sont représentés dans l'image. Ils peuvent être nets ou flous. Ils ne sont pas mieux l'un que l'autre, cela dépend de l'intention du photographe. L'impression de mouvement dépend des différents objets de l'image. Par exemple, photographier une voiture de course qui apparaît nette par rapport à l'arrière plan ne donne pas une idée de la vitesse. Il faudrait en fait que la voiture soit représentée nette, mais avec un arrière plan flou, créant ainsi le mouvement. D'un autre coté, représenter le saut d'un joueur de basket net avec le reste de l'image flou, en raison de la nature peu habituelle de la photo, lui conférerait de l'intérêt.
La profondeur de champ (depth of field or DOF) renvoie à la zone de mise au point devant et au delà du sujet principal. La profondeur de champ est choisie en fonction des besoins spécifiques à chaque image. Une profondeur grande ou petite peut améliorer ou dégrader la qualité de l'image. Une faible profondeur de champ peut attirer l'attention sur le sujet principal, en le séparant de son environnement. Les lentilles à petite distance focale (grand angle) ont une grande profondeur de champ, et vice versa, les lentilles à grande distance focale (petite ouverture) ont une petite profondeur de champ.

Proposition

Si vous pensez avoir trouvé ou créé une image qui puisse être considérée comme parmi les meilleures de Commons, avec une description et une licence appropriée, copiez le nom de l'image dans la boîte ci-dessous (en incluant le préfixe File:), après le texte déjà présent :

Après cela, vous devrez insérer un lien vers la page que vous venez de créer en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list.

Vote

A l'exclusion de tous autres, vous pouvez utiliser les modèles suivants:

{{Pour}} ( Support),
{{Contre}} ( Oppose),

Ainsi que :

{{Neutre}} ( Neutral),
{{Comment}} ( Comment),
{{Info}} ( Info),
{{Question}} ( Question).

Merci d'inclure quelques mots expliquant pourquoi vous soutenez ou non la promotion de l'image, surtout si vous votez contre. N'oubliez pas de signer avec ~~~~.

Règles

Règles générales

Le résultat est donné 9 jours après la proposition (voir le planning en bas de page). Les votes ajoutés le 10^e jour ou après ne sont pas décomptés.
Les utilisateurs non-enregistrés peuvent proposer des images, faire des commentaires, mais pas voter.
La proposition elle-même ne compte pas comme un vote : il faut l'ajouter explicitement.
Le proposant peut retirer une image à tout moment, en écrivant : {{Withdraw}} ~~~~
Souvenez-vous que le but de Wikimedia Commons est une bibliothèque pour tous les projets Wikimedia, y compris des projets futurs ; les images n'ont pas à être utiles uniquement pour Wikipédia.
Les images peuvent être retirées de la liste dès le 5^e jour si elles n'ont reçu aucun vote "pour".
Soyez attentifs et très sélectifs dans les choix que vous faites, car il ne peut y avoir que deux propositions actives par proposant. Toute proposition supplémentaire sera rejetée sans examen.
Seulement 2 nominations actives par même utilisateur (qui est, en nomination sous "review" et non encore close) sont autorisées. Le principal but de cette mesure est de contribuer à une meilleure qualité moyenne des nominations, par un choix plus judicieux des photos présentes en nominations.

Règles de promotion

L'image candidate devient une image remarquable si elle remplit les conditions suivantes :

Une licence appropriée (bien sûr !)
Au moins sept votes "pour".
un ratio de 2/1 de votes "pour"/"contre".
Deux versions différentes de la même image ne peuvent pas être promues en même temps, mais seulement celle avec le plus grand score.

Contestations

Avec le temps, les critères d'évaluation évoluent, et il peut être décidé qu'une image qui était auparavant assez bonne pour être dans la liste ne peut plus l'être.

Pour qu'une image soit déchue, il faut qu'une majorité de 2/3 avec au moins 5 votes accepte de retirer l'image, autrement elle reste "remarquable". Pour voter, utiliser les modèles {{Keep}} ( Keep : mérite de rester "remarquable") ou {{Delist}} ( Delist : ne mérite plus le label).

Pour contester une image, copiez son nom avec le préfixe dans la boîte ci-dessous à la suite du texte déjà présent :

Vous devriez inclure les informations suivantes :

Informations sur l'origine de l'image (créateur, importateur).
Un lien vers le vote d'origine.
La raison pour laquelle vous contestez le label, avec votre signature.

Insérez ensuite un lien en haut de Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal.

Sommaire

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste

Pour ajouter votre proposition à la liste, cliquez ici et ajoutez votre proposition en haut de la liste : {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:FILENAME}}

Propositions en cours

Shortcut

COM:FPC/CL

Featured picture candidates

File:Calamar de arrecifes (Sepioteuthis lessoniana), Nosy Iranja, Madagascar, 2025-09-17, DD 134.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:40:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Cephalopoda
Info Bigfin reef squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana), Nosy Iranja, Madagascar. Note: there are no FPs of this species on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand-duc ascalaphe Oued Tataouine (Bubo ascalaphus).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:05:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed – uploaded by El Golli Mohamed – nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Superbass (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:CADAVRES DE VACHES.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:01:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roques de García - pāhoehoe cascade.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 18:57:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary_Islands
Info: pāhoehoe lava cascade flowing over the Roques de García, Tiede National Park; all by The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Superbass (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Technically quite good, though the mountain peak on the middle-left is slightly out of focus. Somehow perspective and composition lack depth and a point of reference for scale; in this context, the panoramic format may not be the best choice, as it emphasizes the two-dimensionality of the image. As a result, the photo unfortunately appears flat and frontal, and less striking than the subject deserves.[reply]

File:158 Female Northern red-billed hornbill in Etosha National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 14:33:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Bucerotidae (Hornbills)
Info High quality and strong composition; no FPs of this species. created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beautiful nature JackyM59 (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Many thanks for the nomination! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
And thanks for this shoot Wilfredor (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:MG-c12-008 (Francisco Bollini)-colored1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 12:26:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People
Info created by AnonymousUnknown author – uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 12:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarate--Ezarateesteban 11:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andrène agile.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 10:54:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

merci beaucoup SAIDI Ismail (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice photo, but the other photos in the category don't show such a blue insect. Experts will no doubt offer their opinions. -- JackyM59 (talk) 11:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your feedback; the blue issue has been fixed. SAIDI Ismail (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crepuscular rays over La Gomera1.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 10:52:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Crepuscular_rays
Info: crepuscular rays over La Gomera, Canarias, Spain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Архангельское, церковь на рассвете.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 09:38:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created by User:Елена Нечипоренко – uploaded by User:Елена Нечипоренко – nominated by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! Юрий Д.К. 18:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. While the church itself is beautifully lit by the sunrise and the atmosphere is pleasant, the large dark shadow in the lower part of the image is quite distracting and occupies too much space. --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arbre a Ain Drahem Tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 07:30:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Atef Ouni – uploaded by Atef Ouni – nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Atef Ouni: Hi, Please fill up the nomination properly. The gallery is missing above. Also we need a meaningful name, much more information, and proper category for where and what: Location? Tree identification? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Done for the Gallery and I request name change Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good. I renamed your nomination. Now could you please add geolocation to your picture? And this cannot be a featured picture unless the tree species is identified. Yann (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
OK, merci. J'ai renommé votre nomination. Maintenant, pourriez-vous ajouter la Géolocalisation à votre photo? Et elle ne peut être promue sans identification de l'espèce de l'arbre ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm sorry, but I see nothing expectional here. Furthermore the person and the surroudings (bark) are unsharp Poco a poco (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-winged Kite in Tal Chhapar Sanctuary November 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 06:01:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Family_:_Accipitridae_(Buzzards,_eagles,_hawks,_sparrowhawks_and_kites)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:08, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I love this picture of a beautifull Eagle, but even though cropping is normal in bird telephoto photography, this one is an extreme crop, the final image uses only 13% of the sensor’s pixels --Wilfredor (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Црква „Св. Леонтиј“ - Водоча 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 05:46:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info This perspective offers the best view of this early Byzantine basilica, which was built from the 4th to the 5th centuries. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is impossible for me not to support this image, and I think you know why. --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent motif, angle, light, and high resolution. Image quality could be better but other factors outweigh that. Cmao20 (talk) 11:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mochlos-Sitia-Crete-1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 14:01:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mochlos island (Agios Nikolaos). Sitia, Crete, Greece.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Greece
Info Mochlos island (Agios Nikolaos) in the evening with the archaeological excavation site where the excavations continue to this day. Low light shots of this island are quite rare. created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 17:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The horizon should be levelled.--Ermell (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a new version. Is it better now? Petro Stelte (talk) 21:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support pleasing mix of artificial and natural light — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:58, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ocean-related photos are my Achilles’ heel. I spent time looking at this image, searching for some detail in the sky, in the water, or somewhere else that would make it special, but I couldn’t find one. Instead, I see a centered photo that feels monotonous from top to bottom. That said, the shadow makes me question how good this photo really is—not because of what it shows, but because of what it doesn’t show. It is an abstract photo that invites the imagination; I can almost see a lighthouse and a psychiatric hospital in it. --Wilfredor (talk) 02:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice calm low-key mood. A daring nomination because I would have expected it to get picked apart for technical flaws owing to the low light - pleased to see reviewers are more open minded. Cmao20 (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, nice mood, a touch of mystery – a nice change from the usual “full sun” photographs of Greece. – Aristeas (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goya - Portrait de Luis María de Cistué y Martínez (1788-1842), 1790, RF 2009 5.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 13:59:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Portraits, paintings_of_males
Info created by Francisco Goya – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Portrait of Luis María de Cistué y Martínez by Francisco de Goya (1791), Louvre Museum -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good example of breeching, nice repro. JayCubby (talk) 19:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Остатоци од џамија во Доброшинци 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 07:11:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info Once used for religious purposes, now it is a nesting spot for birds. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lyndon Johnson signing Civil Rights Act, July 2, 1964.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 05:48:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1960-
Info a work of an employee of the Executive Office of the President of the United States – uploaded by Tom – nominated by وسيم -- Wassim^talk 05:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator Wassim^talk 05:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment white border at bottom, a bit noisy and dark but historical value --Ezarateesteban 12:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 15.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 00:20:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
Info created by W.carter – uploaded by W.carter – nominated by Pine. See also Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magenta G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 11.jpg by W.carter. Photo 11 is valuable for showing the vertical view, and I believe this one complements it by showing a view of the horizon. ↠Pine (✉) 00:20, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ↠Pine (✉) 00:20, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~oppose - vertical light must be vertical, needs perspective correction~~ — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Rhododendrites and others: Before this gets bogged down in a discussion about perspective correction, let me clarify this. The beams were not coming "straight down" when this photo was taken, they emanated from a point a little above the photo (you can extrapolate the rays). This was the most crazy aurora I've ever witnessed, with some features that don't occur during normal auroras. Like I stated on the file page, it was like standing under a dome of light, with rays coming from a center above me. That's why I could get photos like this where you can clearly see the point of origin of the aurora rays. We don't usually get that at my latitude. The normal thing is that it's centered above the north pole and the we get the aurora formation commonly called "the doughnut", a round "blob" circling the North Pole, and we see drapes.

But this night was different. When the front of the aurora passed over Russia, at least two vortexes were separated from the main doughnut. These resulted in smaller "domes" that stayed stable while they passed over Europe, but dissipated once the reached the Atlantic. You can see these vortexes in the satellite image from NASA. In that image, they are roughly over Saratov and Salavat in southern Russia. One of these vortexes passed over Lysekil where I was, and another one passed over Poland and Germany, giving both a very nice view of this aurora. Another crazy effect of these vortexes, was that when I aimed the camera to the north, where the aurora usually is, there was very little activity there. I even took som reference photos as proof: 1, 2; while facing south, the sky was literally on fire. It was a crazy night! --Cart (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, Cart, that was meant as FPC satire. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:10, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but better safe than sorry. We all know how things can turn out here when ideas are planted in people's brains. ;) --Cart (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful colors -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! Юрий Д.К. 18:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:KF-21 Boramae First Production.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 00:06:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
Info created by Ministry of National Defense of the Republic of Korea – uploaded by MintSkyBlue – nominated by Pine ↠Pine (✉) 00:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ↠Pine (✉) 00:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 06:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-tailed squirrel (Sciurus granatensis chrysuros) Caldas 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 17:53:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info One FP of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:50, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 08:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support

File:বসন্তের পরশ.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 10:11:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Basanta Utsav (Bengali spring festival), Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. created by Rg3300518 – uploaded by Rg3300518 – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 12:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice composition and motive, but satured --Wilfredor (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Question What happened to her face? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:47, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice composition but IMO way oversaturated. I think the photo editing has gone a little far here. Cmao20 (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pisipere Ahja jõe ürgorus.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 01:54:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Mergus
Info created & uploaded by Kylli28 – nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You should ask the photographer to correct saturation and tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:58, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice shot, but oversaturated. --Mile (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, nice mood but very oversatured, tilted, and vignetting. Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chrysanthemum flowers, specifically a variety known for its bi-color blooms with striped pink and white petals.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 17:31:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Asteraceae
Info All by -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:51, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info Why an image of a 21Mpix camera only in 4 Mpix? -- -donald- (talk) 04:28, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Valid question. I ‘ve noticed this problem after editing and uploading through my iPhone. May be some ios issue. RAW file is safe with my camera. Shall upload later. Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 04:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I am torn. The strong shadows and small resolution are not points in its favour, but I do like the composition and colours, and I think the harshness of the light actually brings out the bi-colour nature of the flowers quite nicely. Cmao20 (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 001.jpg

Voting period ends on Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:31:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada
Info In America, we do not have as many ancient and majestic cathedrals as in Europe, but the historical and architectural importance of Holy Trinity Cathedral in Quebec City is significant: it was the first Anglican cathedral built outside the British Isles and a monument to the establishment of the Church of England in Canada after the Conquest, in a city where all the other churches were French Catholic. My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:52, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to get an elevated perspective. I think you got the gallery wrong though - changed now. Cmao20 (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandelbrot Set Image 91.png

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 14:50:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
Info The Mandelbrot set exists independently of our minds and technologies. It is an infinite mathematical structure that has always existed. Computers do not create it; they merely act as a camera. This is a high-resolution, 90-megapixel fragment rendered with True SSAA 8x8 (64 independent samples per pixel), where the blue swirling rays look incredibly like... Created, uploaded and nominated by Aokoroko -- Aokoroko (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aokoroko (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good picture User97104 (talk) 14:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Sorry but needs ≥10d/≥100 edits, has 170d / 48 edits --Wilfredor (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good minibrot capture with high resolution, plenty of Misiurewicz points and nice symmetry --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another psychedelic and buddha like mandala --Wilfredor (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chouette du Maghreb.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 10:30:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Branches in the way. JayCubby (talk) 16:00, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the main subject is just too distractingly obscured Cmao20 (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siskin - Male - Spinus spinus3.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 09:53:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Fringillidae
Info Spinus spinus in Scotland. Сreated by Caroline Legg – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:18, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 01:56, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not just a high quality bird pic but a great composition. I find this picture really satisfying. Cmao20 (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow - 2026 - Bas-relief of the monument to Minin and Pozharsky (panorama).jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 09:50:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info Monument to Minin and Pozharsky in Moscow - Front bas-relief. My photo Юрий Д.К. 09:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:14, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:12, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:20260510 Aidan NZ93134.jpg

Voting period ends on Mon, 08 Jun 2026 04:41:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info @User:Ailura wanted me to nominate this cute little portrait of the maltesian singer Aidan at the turquoise carpet on May 10th 2026. My own work. --Granada (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expressive portrait with strong presence. The striking outfit and hat add clear visual impact. Sufficient bokeh helps isolate the subject; overall a striking event portrait. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good-looking man with a nice Spanish-like outfit. ★ 01:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait. --Yann (talk) 04:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ailura (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:05, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The right side of the outfit almost looks like a giant rose. He is a famous singer. The shadow bothers me a little, but it does not cover his face. It is a lovely photo of a handsome man --Wilfredor (talk) 11:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In fact it is intended to look like a rose, feel free to take a look at the other photos of him during the turquoise carpet 2026: Category:Malta in the Eurovision Song Contest 2026. --Granada (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I just watched them, although they're nowhere near as high quality as this one. Thanks for share Wilfredor (talk) 00:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- E bailey (talk) 17:29, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloeiwijze Rhododendron (Rhododendron ponticum). 19-05-2026 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 04:19:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Ericaceae
Info Inflorescence of a Rhododendron ponticum Focus stack of 69 photos. (Diameter flower ~60mm.)}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:25, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:53, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cosmos bipinnatus in Jardin universitaire Roger-Van den Hende, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada.jpg

Voting period ends on Sun, 07 Jun 2026 22:10:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info I am the photographer. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A near-perfect flower portrait Cmao20 (talk) 22:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:05, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:23, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love flowers. --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Van Buren by Mathew Brady c1855-58 sepia original restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 17:57:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1840-1849
Info created by Mathew Brady – uploaded, restored and by nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Careful restoration of the famous portrait of Martin Van Buren by Mathew Brady, from the original. Another version (black & white converted version) is already featured in the English wikipedia, but not in Commons. My proposal was done by hand only, with GIMP. I have enhanced the size, the sharpness with the low-pass filter technique, and cloned out all the scratches, tears, spots, and other damages by cloning out technique. -- Jebulon (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support! Wassim^talk 05:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barcelona Cityscape Panorama - Jan 2007 edit.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 16:38:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info created and initially uploaded by Diliff – edited by Julia W – nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good Diliff's 2007 image. -- ★ 16:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Some minor OOF foliage in the lower left corner, but very excusable given what the image is. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A shame about the out of focus area in the bottom left corner, and in general I miss an outstanding composition. I often find this with ultra-wide panoramas - that they miss a clear composition and are instead just a wide frame showing a lot of...stuff. The picture is also clearly downsized, which was normal in 2007 when Diliff uploaded this because internet connections were not as fast then as they are now, but 2000px vertical resolution is a little low. Finally, I think the light is quite flat. There are lots of interesting details as usual for Diliff photos but not FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brest Fortress Church of Saint Nicholas 2023-04-23 3554.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 14:43:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belarus
Info I find this church beautiful and I think it has been photographed well, with nice light. No FPs of this subject. The correct gallery will need to be created if this passes, as there are no church FPs from this country so far; I will handle that. created by Mike1979 Russia – uploaded by Mike1979 Russia – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support More FPs of Belarus! ★ 16:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If promoted, it will be our first FP of a church from Belarus. Cmao20 (talk) 20:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree that the church is beautiful and photographed well, but this picture taken by the same photographer on the same day looks more representative. In my opinion, a simpler composition with no disturbing elements, such as the people near the right edge and the large tree obscuring the western side of the church, is more compelling. At the end of the day, both pictures may be featurable. I just wanted to point out to another picture of the same subject. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think both have their advantages but this one is the clearer FP to me. The other one doesn't show as many interesting features of the church, such as the dramatic western facade, and makes the whole building appear somewhat short and squat, whereas the picture I nominated has the church elevated at the top of the steps and lit with warmer light, which makes it look much more inspiring. I won't offer an alternative as I am not convinced the other is an FP but others are of course welcome to nominate it if they disagree with my appraisal. Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Imo both photos deserves FP star Юрий Д.К. 21:51, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 User97104 (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Vote struck: the user has completed only 48 of the required 100 edits so far. Sorry. ,-- Radomianin (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:56, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:13, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Узор на потолке мечети Баланд 6.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 08:53:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Uzbekistan
Info Baland Mosque ceiling pattern. Bukhara, Uzbekistan, created by Spartak22 – nominated by -- Mile (talk) 08:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info 2024 WLM Uzbekistan winner. Made with older camera Cannon EOS 1100D on 12 MPx, but more than fine. Very nice colors.
Support -- Mile (talk) 08:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours, subject, fully agree that resolution and quality are fine Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks like a horizontal perspective correction is needed. Notice at the top how the spacing between the concrete and the start of the tiles is uneven left top corner vs left top corner --Wilfredor (talk) 16:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree with Wilfredor. Also, personally I'd indicate how old the mosque is to better approximate the age of the painting (and the rights status).16:52, 29 May 2026 (UTC) comment from Crisco 1492 --Wilfredor (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2026 (UTC) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2026 (UTC) signed now, thanks[reply]
Info Made 500 years ago, colored in 19th century, as written on Wiki. I think middle line is just like that. Was there (in UZB) and said before, when you think on mistake you might be wrong. If i move left, vertical middle line would go even more to clockwise,but i see should go anticlock. Since we havent see or been there to check it... let it stay as it is. Also will show "unlucky simmetry" on my shots in UZB. --Mile (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Based on Mile's comments, if the author thinks that's the case, he'll correct it. I honestly didn't realize that the nominator wasn't the author. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please, improve the symmetry, it's tilted Poco a poco (talk) 10:14, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since it is in finished contest WLM, and not my shot, i will leave as it is. Maybe we become too "technincal" here of FP and forgot on beauty of pic.--Mile (talk) 07:13, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Poco, but I also disagree with editing an image, especially one that's the winner of WLM, without the author's supervision. Perhaps someone could edit it and create an alt version? Wilfredor (talk) 00:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:15, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charançon rouge des palmiers (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 14:51:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Curculionidae_(Snout_Beetles/Weevils)
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 20:06, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:26, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, merci beaucoup SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erithacus rubecula mating 628463896.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 23:17:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Muscicapidae#Genus_:_Erithacus
Info Ten current FPs but this is the first image of their mating on commons. Created by Interaccoonale – uploaded by Interaccoonale – nominated by Interaccoonale -- ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a high-quality capture of European robins mating. I selected this frame as the main nomination because it offers the best side-profile composition and educational value. However, this is part of a serial shoot. I have other frames from the same sequence available if the community wishes to see or consider an "Alternative." -- ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this image was uploaded to this site through iNaturalist2Commons and subsequently updated from my local disk. I've added a link to my user page on my iNaturalist profile to prove the copyright ownership. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very beautifull moment, but IMHO heavy JPEG compression (try export it in full quality) and out of focus the top bird. I will change my vote if the JPEG is exported in better quality --Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The compression level is 95. It is not a compression. I think what you're talking about is the side effects of denoising. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 07:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely right Wilfredor (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very good image but unfortunately the cropping of the wing at the top kills it for me. Sorry. --Espandero (talk) 06:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I also worried about it when choosing this file. I personally preferred this one because I thought its wing was full of movement, being very energetic. I am proposing an alternative showing the whole birds and both of them are more in focus.––Interaccoonale (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Comment: This is an alternative as suggested by Wilfredor and Espandero, ensuring that both birds are completely in the frame and are both in focus.––Interaccoonale (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a nice moment captured well, but the image could benefit from some processing to clarify/brighten things up. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
alt 2 Exccelent now and ok to me, thanks for upload this version --Wilfredor (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Espandero (talk) 06:08, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:33, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the alternative. – Aristeas (talk) 13:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version is FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I forgot that I can vote for my own work. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 22:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The WB looks off Poco a poco (talk) 10:16, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's well. Can you explain it in detail? Is it too cool or too warm? ––Interaccoonale (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:16, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Travessa Couto Fernandes 60 Centro São Luís 2025-6016.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 21:36:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info created and uploaded by Prburley – nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 21:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Need perspective fix, look the space on top right corner and bottom right corner --Wilfredor (talk) 00:35, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Wilfredor and I do not really see the “wow factor” expected for a Featured Picture --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Visibly not straight, perspective needs to be fixed, and odd/arbitrary crop. Cmao20 (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @★: Here is a cropped version with perspective correction; if you like it, you could nominate it as an alternative. However please note (everybody) that it is difficult/impossible to achieve complete symmetry – the tiles themselves are not perfectly symmetric. – Aristeas (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! ★ 16:23, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Support ★ 16:25, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better. Cmao20 (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This way it works for me. Thank you for nominating it. – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Convincing geometric rhythm; structural repetition creates a satisfying visual order. As a member of the Pattern Appreciation Society, this is exactly the kind of visual structure I tend to appreciate ;) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:42, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
alt 2 --Wilfredor (talk) 02:36, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:53, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carly Pearce performing at Hogs for Hospice, Leamington, Ontario, 2025-08-01 53.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 19:22:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created & uploaded by Crisco 1492 – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'll be honest, I'd wanted to nominate this - just wasn't sure it was up to the high standards demanded here. Thanks for making the nomination. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice --Ezarateesteban 11:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not a portrait, but an action shot and the microphone spoils the view, it's a bit too much obstructing her face. For an action shot it does not wow me, especially from her facial expression. --Granada (talk) 15:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Granada --Wilfredor (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- E bailey (talk) 04:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is definitely a good and high-quality image, but something feels missing from FP. The framing also rubs me the wrong way, not even sure why. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de San Agustín, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 17:44:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Paris
Info Church of Saint Augustin, Paris, France. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent play with the unavoidable distorsion. Very good, and I know the place ! --Jebulon (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose composition is not ideal for FP distracting foreground elements, awkward chandelier crop, and very strong wide-angle distortion reduce the overall visual balance. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Olfa Yakoubi --Tagooty (talk) 06:18, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good wide angle view in high quality.--Ermell (talk) 06:28, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support crop chairs in bottom, to start bellow first step, so chairs wont disturb and view is more clear. --Mile (talk) 07:19, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO opposing this for the perspective distortion is somewhat close-minded, sorry to say. Not every picture needs to be perspective-corrected to death. This picture instead chooses to highlight the perspective distortion as a feature to illustrate the imposing scale of the building, which is an entirely valid approach. Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assessment, Cmao20, but I think the motivation for the vote is not based on the picture itselft. I just realised that when I went through all current FP candidates yesterday morning I opposed the 2 noms of Olfa Yakoubi because none of them convinced me in terms of level of detail. The first edit he/she did afterwards was coming here to oppose this candidate (and second oppose in his FP record, what are the odds?). Definitely unfair but nothing unusual. Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Se que no podemos prevenir esto, pero al menos conmigo, votame todo lo negativo que puedas, nunca hare eso. Aunque a veces pudiera estar equivocado intento ser lo mas objetivo posible Wilfredor (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’m really disappointed and honestly hurt by your comment, Diego. Reading that my vote could be interpreted as revenge or retaliation was painful for me, because that is not how I participate in FP discussions at all.

I can’t imagine that you would think my oppose is related to the fact that you opposed some pictures I nominated — especially since this not even mine photo. I always try to give my opinion based on the image itself and according to my understanding of FP criteria, even when my opinion may differ from others.

I still don’t like the composition of this photo. In my opinion, the framing is not ideal, the foreground elements are distracting, and the brightness and distortion affect the overall visual balance. That is why I opposed it, and I still stand by my opinion sincerely and in good faith.

What hurt me the most is the implication that my opinion was dishonest or motivated by personal feelings. I respect your work and your contributions a lot. In fact, I have supported some of your photos before, and there are also photos of yours that I personally don’t like but chose not to oppose because I respect different artistic views and standards.

By the way, we already met before — I don’t know if you remember — and I genuinely appreciate your photography overall. That is also why this statement was painful for me to read. Even when we disagree on a nomination, I believe we should assume good faith and respect each other’s opinions.

And honestly, after reading your comment, I no longer feel comfortable voting on your photos in the future if my opinions are going to be interpreted this way instead of being seen as sincere photographic criticism.

For this specific picture, I simply do not think it reaches FP level, and my vote was made honestly, sincerely, and without any personal intention. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 17:46, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think that what Diego commented is not what he meant, remember that his level of English is not very good and he could use very direct or incorrect words, there is also the cultural difference. Wilfredor (talk) 19:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please Wilfredor, don't talk for me about what I meant or not. I don't think either, that you are the most appropiate person to judge my level of English. I meant what I wrote, because although I don't know Olfa Yokoubi, I've often seen this behavior very often in the almost last 20 years. That's why I wonder about the odds that the first edit after my 2 opposes is right away a decline here. Olfa, you will have to recognize that if my opposes didn't play a role in your oppose it looks at least suspicious. Still I'm happy to read that you confirm otherwise. Poco a poco (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your English is absolutely fine, Poco. Best to leave this whole nonsensical discussion. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, Poco poco; it wasn't my place to interpret what you meant or judge your English. I'm sorry, it was a mistake on my part. I'll leave Wilfredor (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, Cmao20, let's move on Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support The way the chairs are cut off at the bottom is a bit annoying; I would have cut it at the level of the stairs, but that's more of a personal decision than a technically valid one. The chandelier also obstructs the view of the dome, but I understand it's a necessary sacrifice since it's not something that can be removed. Thank you for this nomination. I have a similar one from another church, and I had my doubts about whether this type of composition would be accepted, but I agree that not all wide-angle distortion needs to be corrected, especially if the result would create a completely disproportionate image. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 13:13, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:48, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Olfa, great quality and the wide angle doesn't bother me much but the image does have distracting elements (chairs and chandelier) and I'm unconvinced by the crop. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:41, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Argiope lobata - 08-2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 18:32:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family_:_Araneidae_(Orb-weaver_Spiders)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 04:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMHO Overexposed and lack of DoF and focus --Wilfredor (talk) 11:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback.

Really overexposed? I don't think so.

The depth of field is shallow, admittedly, but I think it's fine.

Thanks Skander zarrad (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I like the picture and it’s not strongly overexposed to the point of burning out the photo, but some areas could have more texture if they were slightly less bright. There’s a fine line between what is acceptable and what isn’t, so take this more as my personal opinion than as an absolute truth. In short, don’t take it too seriously. Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:21, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:13, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common redshank (Tringa totanus) breeding Marken.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 17:09:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Tringa
Info Two current FPs, one and two. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Question Technically excellent, but I was recently told that FPC should be « the Best of Commons ». Should we have three « Best of Commons » pictures of the same bird ? --Jebulon (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We do have a delist procedure, but not sure that is appropriate here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:35, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As they are different, I would keep 02 and this one; delist 01. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support No point punishing this picture because worse FPs exist of the same species Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. “Best of Commons” does not mean “the best photos of each subject” – for that we have got VI –, it means “the best images on Commons”. If we have 10 great and wonderful photos of species A and only 1 mediocre photo of species B, we can feature all 10 great photos of species A, if they are really great and are sufficiently different (showing different aspects/perspectives/poses/subspecies/… of species A), but must not feature the mediocre photo of species B; the latter should become a VI for species B, of course. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Best in the scope, hight quality, used on WP. Please fix the space color than look Uncalibrated --Wilfredor (talk) 21:54, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Small Minivet in Saswad August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 05:02:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Campephagidae_(Cuckooshrikes_and_allies)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:56, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:46, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good composition, but detail below the bar for such perched birds. --Tagooty (talk) 06:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not very sharp compared to the standard for this type of bird photography in FPC, image heavily cropped or downsized compared to the size that the sensor delivers. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks fine to me, and yes of course it is cropped, most wildlife photographs are...Cmao20 (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The orange of the breast contrasts very pleasingly with the green background LetmeEditit (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition and colour contrast. Feather details appear a bit soft, but I guess we are spoiled a bit by the heavy AI sharpening many wildlife photographs use today and Tisha just did not apply such strong sharpening. So in the end the photo is possibly not softer, just less processed than other candidates. – Aristeas (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Contestations en cours

Shortcut

COM:FPC/CL

Featured picture candidates

File:Calamar de arrecifes (Sepioteuthis lessoniana), Nosy Iranja, Madagascar, 2025-09-17, DD 134.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:40:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Cephalopoda
Info Bigfin reef squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana), Nosy Iranja, Madagascar. Note: there are no FPs of this species on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand-duc ascalaphe Oued Tataouine (Bubo ascalaphus).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:05:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed – uploaded by El Golli Mohamed – nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Superbass (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:CADAVRES DE VACHES.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:01:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roques de García - pāhoehoe cascade.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 18:57:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary_Islands
Info: pāhoehoe lava cascade flowing over the Roques de García, Tiede National Park; all by The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Superbass (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Technically quite good, though the mountain peak on the middle-left is slightly out of focus. Somehow perspective and composition lack depth and a point of reference for scale; in this context, the panoramic format may not be the best choice, as it emphasizes the two-dimensionality of the image. As a result, the photo unfortunately appears flat and frontal, and less striking than the subject deserves.[reply]

File:158 Female Northern red-billed hornbill in Etosha National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 14:33:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Bucerotidae (Hornbills)
Info High quality and strong composition; no FPs of this species. created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beautiful nature JackyM59 (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Many thanks for the nomination! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
And thanks for this shoot Wilfredor (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:MG-c12-008 (Francisco Bollini)-colored1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 12:26:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People
Info created by AnonymousUnknown author – uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 12:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarate--Ezarateesteban 11:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andrène agile.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 10:54:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

merci beaucoup SAIDI Ismail (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice photo, but the other photos in the category don't show such a blue insect. Experts will no doubt offer their opinions. -- JackyM59 (talk) 11:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your feedback; the blue issue has been fixed. SAIDI Ismail (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crepuscular rays over La Gomera1.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 10:52:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Crepuscular_rays
Info: crepuscular rays over La Gomera, Canarias, Spain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Архангельское, церковь на рассвете.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 09:38:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created by User:Елена Нечипоренко – uploaded by User:Елена Нечипоренко – nominated by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! Юрий Д.К. 18:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. While the church itself is beautifully lit by the sunrise and the atmosphere is pleasant, the large dark shadow in the lower part of the image is quite distracting and occupies too much space. --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arbre a Ain Drahem Tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 07:30:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Atef Ouni – uploaded by Atef Ouni – nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Atef Ouni: Hi, Please fill up the nomination properly. The gallery is missing above. Also we need a meaningful name, much more information, and proper category for where and what: Location? Tree identification? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Done for the Gallery and I request name change Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good. I renamed your nomination. Now could you please add geolocation to your picture? And this cannot be a featured picture unless the tree species is identified. Yann (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
OK, merci. J'ai renommé votre nomination. Maintenant, pourriez-vous ajouter la Géolocalisation à votre photo? Et elle ne peut être promue sans identification de l'espèce de l'arbre ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm sorry, but I see nothing expectional here. Furthermore the person and the surroudings (bark) are unsharp Poco a poco (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-winged Kite in Tal Chhapar Sanctuary November 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 06:01:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Family_:_Accipitridae_(Buzzards,_eagles,_hawks,_sparrowhawks_and_kites)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:08, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I love this picture of a beautifull Eagle, but even though cropping is normal in bird telephoto photography, this one is an extreme crop, the final image uses only 13% of the sensor’s pixels --Wilfredor (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Црква „Св. Леонтиј“ - Водоча 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 05:46:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info This perspective offers the best view of this early Byzantine basilica, which was built from the 4th to the 5th centuries. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is impossible for me not to support this image, and I think you know why. --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent motif, angle, light, and high resolution. Image quality could be better but other factors outweigh that. Cmao20 (talk) 11:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mochlos-Sitia-Crete-1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 14:01:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Greece
Info Mochlos island (Agios Nikolaos) in the evening with the archaeological excavation site where the excavations continue to this day. Low light shots of this island are quite rare. created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 17:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The horizon should be levelled.--Ermell (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a new version. Is it better now? Petro Stelte (talk) 21:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support pleasing mix of artificial and natural light — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:58, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ocean-related photos are my Achilles’ heel. I spent time looking at this image, searching for some detail in the sky, in the water, or somewhere else that would make it special, but I couldn’t find one. Instead, I see a centered photo that feels monotonous from top to bottom. That said, the shadow makes me question how good this photo really is—not because of what it shows, but because of what it doesn’t show. It is an abstract photo that invites the imagination; I can almost see a lighthouse and a psychiatric hospital in it. --Wilfredor (talk) 02:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice calm low-key mood. A daring nomination because I would have expected it to get picked apart for technical flaws owing to the low light - pleased to see reviewers are more open minded. Cmao20 (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, nice mood, a touch of mystery – a nice change from the usual “full sun” photographs of Greece. – Aristeas (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goya - Portrait de Luis María de Cistué y Martínez (1788-1842), 1790, RF 2009 5.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 13:59:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Portraits, paintings_of_males
Info created by Francisco Goya – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Portrait of Luis María de Cistué y Martínez by Francisco de Goya (1791), Louvre Museum -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good example of breeching, nice repro. JayCubby (talk) 19:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Остатоци од џамија во Доброшинци 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 07:11:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info Once used for religious purposes, now it is a nesting spot for birds. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lyndon Johnson signing Civil Rights Act, July 2, 1964.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 05:48:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1960-
Info a work of an employee of the Executive Office of the President of the United States – uploaded by Tom – nominated by وسيم -- Wassim^talk 05:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator Wassim^talk 05:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment white border at bottom, a bit noisy and dark but historical value --Ezarateesteban 12:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 15.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 00:20:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
Info created by W.carter – uploaded by W.carter – nominated by Pine. See also Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magenta G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 11.jpg by W.carter. Photo 11 is valuable for showing the vertical view, and I believe this one complements it by showing a view of the horizon. ↠Pine (✉) 00:20, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ↠Pine (✉) 00:20, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~oppose - vertical light must be vertical, needs perspective correction~~ — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Rhododendrites and others: Before this gets bogged down in a discussion about perspective correction, let me clarify this. The beams were not coming "straight down" when this photo was taken, they emanated from a point a little above the photo (you can extrapolate the rays). This was the most crazy aurora I've ever witnessed, with some features that don't occur during normal auroras. Like I stated on the file page, it was like standing under a dome of light, with rays coming from a center above me. That's why I could get photos like this where you can clearly see the point of origin of the aurora rays. We don't usually get that at my latitude. The normal thing is that it's centered above the north pole and the we get the aurora formation commonly called "the doughnut", a round "blob" circling the North Pole, and we see drapes.

But this night was different. When the front of the aurora passed over Russia, at least two vortexes were separated from the main doughnut. These resulted in smaller "domes" that stayed stable while they passed over Europe, but dissipated once the reached the Atlantic. You can see these vortexes in the satellite image from NASA. In that image, they are roughly over Saratov and Salavat in southern Russia. One of these vortexes passed over Lysekil where I was, and another one passed over Poland and Germany, giving both a very nice view of this aurora. Another crazy effect of these vortexes, was that when I aimed the camera to the north, where the aurora usually is, there was very little activity there. I even took som reference photos as proof: 1, 2; while facing south, the sky was literally on fire. It was a crazy night! --Cart (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, Cart, that was meant as FPC satire. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:10, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but better safe than sorry. We all know how things can turn out here when ideas are planted in people's brains. ;) --Cart (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful colors -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! Юрий Д.К. 18:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:KF-21 Boramae First Production.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 00:06:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
Info created by Ministry of National Defense of the Republic of Korea – uploaded by MintSkyBlue – nominated by Pine ↠Pine (✉) 00:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ↠Pine (✉) 00:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 06:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-tailed squirrel (Sciurus granatensis chrysuros) Caldas 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 17:53:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info One FP of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:50, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 08:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support

File:বসন্তের পরশ.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 10:11:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Basanta Utsav (Bengali spring festival), Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. created by Rg3300518 – uploaded by Rg3300518 – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 12:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice composition and motive, but satured --Wilfredor (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Question What happened to her face? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:47, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice composition but IMO way oversaturated. I think the photo editing has gone a little far here. Cmao20 (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pisipere Ahja jõe ürgorus.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 01:54:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Mergus
Info created & uploaded by Kylli28 – nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You should ask the photographer to correct saturation and tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:58, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice shot, but oversaturated. --Mile (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, nice mood but very oversatured, tilted, and vignetting. Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chrysanthemum flowers, specifically a variety known for its bi-color blooms with striped pink and white petals.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 17:31:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Asteraceae
Info All by -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:51, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info Why an image of a 21Mpix camera only in 4 Mpix? -- -donald- (talk) 04:28, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Valid question. I ‘ve noticed this problem after editing and uploading through my iPhone. May be some ios issue. RAW file is safe with my camera. Shall upload later. Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 04:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I am torn. The strong shadows and small resolution are not points in its favour, but I do like the composition and colours, and I think the harshness of the light actually brings out the bi-colour nature of the flowers quite nicely. Cmao20 (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 001.jpg

Voting period ends on Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:31:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada
Info In America, we do not have as many ancient and majestic cathedrals as in Europe, but the historical and architectural importance of Holy Trinity Cathedral in Quebec City is significant: it was the first Anglican cathedral built outside the British Isles and a monument to the establishment of the Church of England in Canada after the Conquest, in a city where all the other churches were French Catholic. My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:52, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to get an elevated perspective. I think you got the gallery wrong though - changed now. Cmao20 (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandelbrot Set Image 91.png

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 14:50:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
Info The Mandelbrot set exists independently of our minds and technologies. It is an infinite mathematical structure that has always existed. Computers do not create it; they merely act as a camera. This is a high-resolution, 90-megapixel fragment rendered with True SSAA 8x8 (64 independent samples per pixel), where the blue swirling rays look incredibly like... Created, uploaded and nominated by Aokoroko -- Aokoroko (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aokoroko (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good picture User97104 (talk) 14:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Sorry but needs ≥10d/≥100 edits, has 170d / 48 edits --Wilfredor (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good minibrot capture with high resolution, plenty of Misiurewicz points and nice symmetry --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another psychedelic and buddha like mandala --Wilfredor (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chouette du Maghreb.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 10:30:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Branches in the way. JayCubby (talk) 16:00, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the main subject is just too distractingly obscured Cmao20 (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siskin - Male - Spinus spinus3.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 09:53:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Fringillidae
Info Spinus spinus in Scotland. Сreated by Caroline Legg – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:18, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 01:56, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not just a high quality bird pic but a great composition. I find this picture really satisfying. Cmao20 (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow - 2026 - Bas-relief of the monument to Minin and Pozharsky (panorama).jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 09:50:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info Monument to Minin and Pozharsky in Moscow - Front bas-relief. My photo Юрий Д.К. 09:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:14, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:12, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:20260510 Aidan NZ93134.jpg

Voting period ends on Mon, 08 Jun 2026 04:41:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info @User:Ailura wanted me to nominate this cute little portrait of the maltesian singer Aidan at the turquoise carpet on May 10th 2026. My own work. --Granada (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expressive portrait with strong presence. The striking outfit and hat add clear visual impact. Sufficient bokeh helps isolate the subject; overall a striking event portrait. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good-looking man with a nice Spanish-like outfit. ★ 01:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait. --Yann (talk) 04:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ailura (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:05, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The right side of the outfit almost looks like a giant rose. He is a famous singer. The shadow bothers me a little, but it does not cover his face. It is a lovely photo of a handsome man --Wilfredor (talk) 11:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In fact it is intended to look like a rose, feel free to take a look at the other photos of him during the turquoise carpet 2026: Category:Malta in the Eurovision Song Contest 2026. --Granada (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I just watched them, although they're nowhere near as high quality as this one. Thanks for share Wilfredor (talk) 00:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- E bailey (talk) 17:29, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloeiwijze Rhododendron (Rhododendron ponticum). 19-05-2026 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 04:19:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Ericaceae
Info Inflorescence of a Rhododendron ponticum Focus stack of 69 photos. (Diameter flower ~60mm.)}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:25, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:53, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cosmos bipinnatus in Jardin universitaire Roger-Van den Hende, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada.jpg

Voting period ends on Sun, 07 Jun 2026 22:10:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info I am the photographer. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A near-perfect flower portrait Cmao20 (talk) 22:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:05, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:23, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love flowers. --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Van Buren by Mathew Brady c1855-58 sepia original restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 17:57:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1840-1849
Info created by Mathew Brady – uploaded, restored and by nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Careful restoration of the famous portrait of Martin Van Buren by Mathew Brady, from the original. Another version (black & white converted version) is already featured in the English wikipedia, but not in Commons. My proposal was done by hand only, with GIMP. I have enhanced the size, the sharpness with the low-pass filter technique, and cloned out all the scratches, tears, spots, and other damages by cloning out technique. -- Jebulon (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support! Wassim^talk 05:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barcelona Cityscape Panorama - Jan 2007 edit.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 16:38:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info created and initially uploaded by Diliff – edited by Julia W – nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good Diliff's 2007 image. -- ★ 16:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Some minor OOF foliage in the lower left corner, but very excusable given what the image is. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A shame about the out of focus area in the bottom left corner, and in general I miss an outstanding composition. I often find this with ultra-wide panoramas - that they miss a clear composition and are instead just a wide frame showing a lot of...stuff. The picture is also clearly downsized, which was normal in 2007 when Diliff uploaded this because internet connections were not as fast then as they are now, but 2000px vertical resolution is a little low. Finally, I think the light is quite flat. There are lots of interesting details as usual for Diliff photos but not FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brest Fortress Church of Saint Nicholas 2023-04-23 3554.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 14:43:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belarus
Info I find this church beautiful and I think it has been photographed well, with nice light. No FPs of this subject. The correct gallery will need to be created if this passes, as there are no church FPs from this country so far; I will handle that. created by Mike1979 Russia – uploaded by Mike1979 Russia – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support More FPs of Belarus! ★ 16:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If promoted, it will be our first FP of a church from Belarus. Cmao20 (talk) 20:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree that the church is beautiful and photographed well, but this picture taken by the same photographer on the same day looks more representative. In my opinion, a simpler composition with no disturbing elements, such as the people near the right edge and the large tree obscuring the western side of the church, is more compelling. At the end of the day, both pictures may be featurable. I just wanted to point out to another picture of the same subject. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think both have their advantages but this one is the clearer FP to me. The other one doesn't show as many interesting features of the church, such as the dramatic western facade, and makes the whole building appear somewhat short and squat, whereas the picture I nominated has the church elevated at the top of the steps and lit with warmer light, which makes it look much more inspiring. I won't offer an alternative as I am not convinced the other is an FP but others are of course welcome to nominate it if they disagree with my appraisal. Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Imo both photos deserves FP star Юрий Д.К. 21:51, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 User97104 (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Vote struck: the user has completed only 48 of the required 100 edits so far. Sorry. ,-- Radomianin (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:56, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:13, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Узор на потолке мечети Баланд 6.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 08:53:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Uzbekistan
Info Baland Mosque ceiling pattern. Bukhara, Uzbekistan, created by Spartak22 – nominated by -- Mile (talk) 08:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info 2024 WLM Uzbekistan winner. Made with older camera Cannon EOS 1100D on 12 MPx, but more than fine. Very nice colors.
Support -- Mile (talk) 08:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours, subject, fully agree that resolution and quality are fine Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks like a horizontal perspective correction is needed. Notice at the top how the spacing between the concrete and the start of the tiles is uneven left top corner vs left top corner --Wilfredor (talk) 16:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree with Wilfredor. Also, personally I'd indicate how old the mosque is to better approximate the age of the painting (and the rights status).16:52, 29 May 2026 (UTC) comment from Crisco 1492 --Wilfredor (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2026 (UTC) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2026 (UTC) signed now, thanks[reply]
Info Made 500 years ago, colored in 19th century, as written on Wiki. I think middle line is just like that. Was there (in UZB) and said before, when you think on mistake you might be wrong. If i move left, vertical middle line would go even more to clockwise,but i see should go anticlock. Since we havent see or been there to check it... let it stay as it is. Also will show "unlucky simmetry" on my shots in UZB. --Mile (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Based on Mile's comments, if the author thinks that's the case, he'll correct it. I honestly didn't realize that the nominator wasn't the author. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please, improve the symmetry, it's tilted Poco a poco (talk) 10:14, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since it is in finished contest WLM, and not my shot, i will leave as it is. Maybe we become too "technincal" here of FP and forgot on beauty of pic.--Mile (talk) 07:13, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Poco, but I also disagree with editing an image, especially one that's the winner of WLM, without the author's supervision. Perhaps someone could edit it and create an alt version? Wilfredor (talk) 00:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:15, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charançon rouge des palmiers (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 14:51:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Curculionidae_(Snout_Beetles/Weevils)
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 20:06, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:26, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, merci beaucoup SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erithacus rubecula mating 628463896.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 23:17:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Muscicapidae#Genus_:_Erithacus
Info Ten current FPs but this is the first image of their mating on commons. Created by Interaccoonale – uploaded by Interaccoonale – nominated by Interaccoonale -- ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a high-quality capture of European robins mating. I selected this frame as the main nomination because it offers the best side-profile composition and educational value. However, this is part of a serial shoot. I have other frames from the same sequence available if the community wishes to see or consider an "Alternative." -- ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this image was uploaded to this site through iNaturalist2Commons and subsequently updated from my local disk. I've added a link to my user page on my iNaturalist profile to prove the copyright ownership. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very beautifull moment, but IMHO heavy JPEG compression (try export it in full quality) and out of focus the top bird. I will change my vote if the JPEG is exported in better quality --Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The compression level is 95. It is not a compression. I think what you're talking about is the side effects of denoising. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 07:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely right Wilfredor (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very good image but unfortunately the cropping of the wing at the top kills it for me. Sorry. --Espandero (talk) 06:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I also worried about it when choosing this file. I personally preferred this one because I thought its wing was full of movement, being very energetic. I am proposing an alternative showing the whole birds and both of them are more in focus.––Interaccoonale (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Comment: This is an alternative as suggested by Wilfredor and Espandero, ensuring that both birds are completely in the frame and are both in focus.––Interaccoonale (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a nice moment captured well, but the image could benefit from some processing to clarify/brighten things up. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
alt 2 Exccelent now and ok to me, thanks for upload this version --Wilfredor (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Espandero (talk) 06:08, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:33, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the alternative. – Aristeas (talk) 13:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version is FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I forgot that I can vote for my own work. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 22:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The WB looks off Poco a poco (talk) 10:16, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's well. Can you explain it in detail? Is it too cool or too warm? ––Interaccoonale (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:16, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Travessa Couto Fernandes 60 Centro São Luís 2025-6016.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 21:36:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info created and uploaded by Prburley – nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 21:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Need perspective fix, look the space on top right corner and bottom right corner --Wilfredor (talk) 00:35, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Wilfredor and I do not really see the “wow factor” expected for a Featured Picture --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Visibly not straight, perspective needs to be fixed, and odd/arbitrary crop. Cmao20 (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @★: Here is a cropped version with perspective correction; if you like it, you could nominate it as an alternative. However please note (everybody) that it is difficult/impossible to achieve complete symmetry – the tiles themselves are not perfectly symmetric. – Aristeas (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! ★ 16:23, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Support ★ 16:25, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better. Cmao20 (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This way it works for me. Thank you for nominating it. – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Convincing geometric rhythm; structural repetition creates a satisfying visual order. As a member of the Pattern Appreciation Society, this is exactly the kind of visual structure I tend to appreciate ;) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:42, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
alt 2 --Wilfredor (talk) 02:36, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:53, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carly Pearce performing at Hogs for Hospice, Leamington, Ontario, 2025-08-01 53.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 19:22:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created & uploaded by Crisco 1492 – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'll be honest, I'd wanted to nominate this - just wasn't sure it was up to the high standards demanded here. Thanks for making the nomination. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice --Ezarateesteban 11:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not a portrait, but an action shot and the microphone spoils the view, it's a bit too much obstructing her face. For an action shot it does not wow me, especially from her facial expression. --Granada (talk) 15:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Granada --Wilfredor (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- E bailey (talk) 04:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is definitely a good and high-quality image, but something feels missing from FP. The framing also rubs me the wrong way, not even sure why. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de San Agustín, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 17:44:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Paris
Info Church of Saint Augustin, Paris, France. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent play with the unavoidable distorsion. Very good, and I know the place ! --Jebulon (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose composition is not ideal for FP distracting foreground elements, awkward chandelier crop, and very strong wide-angle distortion reduce the overall visual balance. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Olfa Yakoubi --Tagooty (talk) 06:18, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good wide angle view in high quality.--Ermell (talk) 06:28, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support crop chairs in bottom, to start bellow first step, so chairs wont disturb and view is more clear. --Mile (talk) 07:19, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO opposing this for the perspective distortion is somewhat close-minded, sorry to say. Not every picture needs to be perspective-corrected to death. This picture instead chooses to highlight the perspective distortion as a feature to illustrate the imposing scale of the building, which is an entirely valid approach. Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assessment, Cmao20, but I think the motivation for the vote is not based on the picture itselft. I just realised that when I went through all current FP candidates yesterday morning I opposed the 2 noms of Olfa Yakoubi because none of them convinced me in terms of level of detail. The first edit he/she did afterwards was coming here to oppose this candidate (and second oppose in his FP record, what are the odds?). Definitely unfair but nothing unusual. Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Se que no podemos prevenir esto, pero al menos conmigo, votame todo lo negativo que puedas, nunca hare eso. Aunque a veces pudiera estar equivocado intento ser lo mas objetivo posible Wilfredor (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’m really disappointed and honestly hurt by your comment, Diego. Reading that my vote could be interpreted as revenge or retaliation was painful for me, because that is not how I participate in FP discussions at all.

I can’t imagine that you would think my oppose is related to the fact that you opposed some pictures I nominated — especially since this not even mine photo. I always try to give my opinion based on the image itself and according to my understanding of FP criteria, even when my opinion may differ from others.

I still don’t like the composition of this photo. In my opinion, the framing is not ideal, the foreground elements are distracting, and the brightness and distortion affect the overall visual balance. That is why I opposed it, and I still stand by my opinion sincerely and in good faith.

What hurt me the most is the implication that my opinion was dishonest or motivated by personal feelings. I respect your work and your contributions a lot. In fact, I have supported some of your photos before, and there are also photos of yours that I personally don’t like but chose not to oppose because I respect different artistic views and standards.

By the way, we already met before — I don’t know if you remember — and I genuinely appreciate your photography overall. That is also why this statement was painful for me to read. Even when we disagree on a nomination, I believe we should assume good faith and respect each other’s opinions.

And honestly, after reading your comment, I no longer feel comfortable voting on your photos in the future if my opinions are going to be interpreted this way instead of being seen as sincere photographic criticism.

For this specific picture, I simply do not think it reaches FP level, and my vote was made honestly, sincerely, and without any personal intention. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 17:46, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think that what Diego commented is not what he meant, remember that his level of English is not very good and he could use very direct or incorrect words, there is also the cultural difference. Wilfredor (talk) 19:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please Wilfredor, don't talk for me about what I meant or not. I don't think either, that you are the most appropiate person to judge my level of English. I meant what I wrote, because although I don't know Olfa Yokoubi, I've often seen this behavior very often in the almost last 20 years. That's why I wonder about the odds that the first edit after my 2 opposes is right away a decline here. Olfa, you will have to recognize that if my opposes didn't play a role in your oppose it looks at least suspicious. Still I'm happy to read that you confirm otherwise. Poco a poco (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your English is absolutely fine, Poco. Best to leave this whole nonsensical discussion. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, Poco poco; it wasn't my place to interpret what you meant or judge your English. I'm sorry, it was a mistake on my part. I'll leave Wilfredor (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, Cmao20, let's move on Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support The way the chairs are cut off at the bottom is a bit annoying; I would have cut it at the level of the stairs, but that's more of a personal decision than a technically valid one. The chandelier also obstructs the view of the dome, but I understand it's a necessary sacrifice since it's not something that can be removed. Thank you for this nomination. I have a similar one from another church, and I had my doubts about whether this type of composition would be accepted, but I agree that not all wide-angle distortion needs to be corrected, especially if the result would create a completely disproportionate image. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 13:13, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:48, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Olfa, great quality and the wide angle doesn't bother me much but the image does have distracting elements (chairs and chandelier) and I'm unconvinced by the crop. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:41, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Argiope lobata - 08-2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 18:32:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family_:_Araneidae_(Orb-weaver_Spiders)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 04:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMHO Overexposed and lack of DoF and focus --Wilfredor (talk) 11:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback.

Really overexposed? I don't think so.

The depth of field is shallow, admittedly, but I think it's fine.

Thanks Skander zarrad (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I like the picture and it’s not strongly overexposed to the point of burning out the photo, but some areas could have more texture if they were slightly less bright. There’s a fine line between what is acceptable and what isn’t, so take this more as my personal opinion than as an absolute truth. In short, don’t take it too seriously. Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:21, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:13, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common redshank (Tringa totanus) breeding Marken.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 17:09:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Tringa
Info Two current FPs, one and two. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Question Technically excellent, but I was recently told that FPC should be « the Best of Commons ». Should we have three « Best of Commons » pictures of the same bird ? --Jebulon (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We do have a delist procedure, but not sure that is appropriate here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:35, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As they are different, I would keep 02 and this one; delist 01. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support No point punishing this picture because worse FPs exist of the same species Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. “Best of Commons” does not mean “the best photos of each subject” – for that we have got VI –, it means “the best images on Commons”. If we have 10 great and wonderful photos of species A and only 1 mediocre photo of species B, we can feature all 10 great photos of species A, if they are really great and are sufficiently different (showing different aspects/perspectives/poses/subspecies/… of species A), but must not feature the mediocre photo of species B; the latter should become a VI for species B, of course. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Best in the scope, hight quality, used on WP. Please fix the space color than look Uncalibrated --Wilfredor (talk) 21:54, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Small Minivet in Saswad August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 05:02:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Campephagidae_(Cuckooshrikes_and_allies)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:56, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:46, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good composition, but detail below the bar for such perched birds. --Tagooty (talk) 06:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not very sharp compared to the standard for this type of bird photography in FPC, image heavily cropped or downsized compared to the size that the sensor delivers. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks fine to me, and yes of course it is cropped, most wildlife photographs are...Cmao20 (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The orange of the breast contrasts very pleasingly with the green background LetmeEditit (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition and colour contrast. Feather details appear a bit soft, but I guess we are spoiled a bit by the heavy AI sharpening many wildlife photographs use today and Tisha just did not apply such strong sharpening. So in the end the photo is possibly not softer, just less processed than other candidates. – Aristeas (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Planning (9e jour après proposition)

Mon 25 May → Wed 3 Jun
Tue 26 May → Thu 4 Jun
Wed 27 May → Fri 5 Jun
Thu 28 May → Sat 6 Jun
Fri 29 May → Sun 7 Jun
Sat 30 May → Mon 8 Jun
Sun 31 May → Tue 9 Jun
Mon 1 Jun → Wed 10 Jun
Tue 2 Jun → Thu 11 Jun
Wed 3 Jun → Fri 12 Jun