Commons:Segnalazioni per la vetrina

Segnalazioni per la vetrina in altre lingue:

Shortcut: [[:|COM:FPC]]

Passa alla lista di candidati per la vetrina

Passa alla lista di candidati per la rimozione dalla vetrina

Queste immagini sono candidate per la vetrina. Fare attenzione a non confondere questa pagina con le immagini del giorno.

Guida

Candidare un immagine

Linee guida per candidare un'immagine

È importante leggere le linee guida prima di candidare un'immagine.

A seguito è riportato un riassunto dei punti essenziali per candidare e valutare le immagini candidate:

Risoluzione - Le fotografie con una risoluzione inferiore a 2 milioni di pixel vengono generalmente rifiutate e rimosse ad eccezione di motivi contrari di particolare importanza. Si noti che le immagini con risoluzione 1600 x 1200 hanno 1.92 Mpx, appena inferiore al limite minimo di 2Mpx.

Ricordiamo che le immagini caricate su Commons vengono visualizzate non solo su schermi tradizionali di PC ma sono utilizzate anche per stampa e visualizzazione su schermi ad alta risoluzione. Non possiamo certo prevedere quali tecnologie verranno utilizzate nel futuro quindi è importante che le immagini scelte per la vetrina abbiano una risoluzione quanto più alta è possibile.

Scansioni - È consigliabile seguire la guida alla scansione, che propone suggerimenti per l'ottenimento di immagini ottimali

Fuoco - ovviamente ogni oggetto significativo dell'immagine deve essere ben definito e a fuoco.

Primo piano e sfondo - Oggetti in primissimo piano o di sfondo possono distrarre dalla vista dal oggetto principale dell'immagine. È il caso di controllare se qualche elemento in primo piano non copra nessun elemento importante e che lo sfondo non distolga l'attenzione e renda confusa l'immagine (per esempio evitare che vi sia una luce forte alle spalle di un viso)

Qualità generale - le immagini candidate devono essere di alta qualità tecnica.

Le manipolazioni digitali non devono essere effettuate per ingannare, ma vanno usate solo limitatamente e con cura per correggere difetti fotografici. Le manipolazioni comunemente accettate sono il ritaglio e la correzione di prospettiva, focale, colore ed esposizione. Manipolazioni più estese, come può essere la rimozione di un elemento di distrazione dello sfondo, vanno chiaramente descritte nel testo di descrizione per mezzo del template {{Retouched picture}}. Manipolazioni non descritte o descritte in modo insufficiente non permettono la candidatura alla vetrina.

Valore - il nostro principale obiettivo è eleggere le immagini con il maggior valore rispetto a tutte le loro simili. Le immagini devono essere in qualche modo speciali, perciò fai attenzione:
- quasi tutti i tramonti sono esteticamente piacevoli, infatti molte immagini sono simili alle altre,
- gli scatti notturni sono gradevoli ma generalmente le foto scattate di giorno mostrano molti più dettagli,
- non tutte le belle foto hanno in realtà un valore che non sia esclusivamente personale.

Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto tecnico abbiamo come parametri l'esposizione, la composizione, il controllo del movimento e la profondità di campo.

L'esposizione si riferisce alla combinazione tra tempo di esposizione e diaframma. Questa combinazione permette generalmente di avere una curva di tono che è in grado di rappresentare ombre e luci con un dettaglio accettabile. Questa curva viene detta latitudine di posa. Un'immagine può essere nella banda bassa, media o alta. Le fotocamere digitali (e le loro foto) hanno una latitudine di posa più stretta delle macchine a pellicola. La mancanza di dettagli nelle zone d'ombra non è necessariamente una caratteristica negativa. Infatti questa può essere parte dell'effetto desiderato, mentre ampie zone eccessivamente sovraesposte possono distrarre la vista.

La composizione si riferisce alla distribuzione degli elementi nell'immagine. La “Regola dei Terzi” è una buona linea guida per la composizione e eredita molto dagli studi di disegno. Il concetto principale considera l'immagine divisa con due linee orizzontali e due verticali, che dividono l'immagine in tre parti. Generalmente se l'oggetto viene centrato si ha un effetto poco interessante, mentre se l'oggetto viene posizionato in uno dei punti di interesse, ovvero l'intersezione delle quattro linee, si ottiene un effetto decisamente migliore. Le linee dell'orizzonte infatti non dovrebbero essere posizionate nel centro, perché taglierebbero la foto a metà; è invece preferibile scegliere una delle linee orizzontali. Complessivamente bisogna tendere a creare un'immagine dinamica.

Il controllo del movimento si riferisce al modo viene rappresentato il movimento nell'immagine. Il movimento può essere bloccato (seguito dalla fotocamera) oppure può essere lasciato scorrere, tuttavia l'oggetto principale dell'immagine deve essere visibile. Nessuna delle due tecniche è migliore dell'altra, la buona riuscita dipende esclusivamente dal tipo di effetto ricercato. Per esempio, fotografando una vettura da corsa che appare statica in relazione allo sfondo, che invece scorre sul retro, si ottiene l'oggetto principale in una condizione statica mentre lo sfondo crea il senso di movimento. (questa tecnica è chiamata "panning"). D'altra parte, fotografando un giocatore di basket in salto, bloccato in relazione a tutto il resto dello sfondo, si otterrebbe un buono scatto proprio per la posa innaturale.

La profondità di campo (PdC o DOF dall'inglese depth of field) è la distanza davanti e dietro il soggetto principale che appare nitida (a fuoco). Questo parametro viene scelto a seconda delle necessità di ogni immagine e può parimenti migliorare o peggiorare la qualità di una fotografia. Generalmente viene utilizzata una PdC ridotta per mettere al centro dell'attenzione il soggetto principale, separandolo da tutto il resto dello sfondo. Invece viene utilizzata una grande PdC per enfatizzare la profondità di un immagine. Gli obiettivi grandangolari in genere una grande PdC mentre i teleobiettivi ne hanno una decisamente ridotta. In gran parte la PdC dipende dall'apertura del diaframma: aumenta con il diminuire dell'apertura e viceversa.

Per quanto riguarda l'aspetto grafico prendiamo invece in considerazione nitidezza, profondità, colore, superficie, prospettiva, bilanciamento, proporzione, ecc.

La nitidezza si riferisce alle linee di contorno del soggetto principale.

La profondità si riferisce alla qualità dell'aspetto tridimensionale del soggetto. Ciò si ottiene soprattutto tramite un'adeguata illuminazione laterale (come quella della prima mattinata o del tardo pomeriggio) e non esclusivamente frontale, al fine di evitare l'appiattimento del soggetto.

Il colore è un elemento molto importante e non deve essere né troppo né poco saturo.

La superficie si riferisce alla qualità della superficie degli oggetti fotografati.

La prospettiva si riferisce all'angolazione dalla quale è stata scattata la fotografia. Essa crea una serie di rette immaginarie che seguono gli spigoli paralleli degli oggetti e si incontrano in un punto che può essere dentro o fuori l'immagine.

Il bilanciamento si riferisce alla disposizione degli oggetti nell'immagine e può essere equilibrato o porre maggior peso verso una direzione.

La proporzione si riferisce alla relazione tra le dimensioni degli oggetti all'interno dell'immagine. Generalmente si tende a rappresentare oggetti con ridotta relazione, ma una buona tecnica è quella di rappresentare gli oggetti di dimensioni minori in modo più esteso, contrariamente a quanto è in realtà. Per esempio, un piccolo fiore che viene rappresentato con le stesse dimensioni di una grande montagna: questa tecnica viene chiamata inversione di scala.

Ovviamente, non tutte le caratteristiche devono essere necessariamente presenti. Le immagini possono essere giudicate sia per una sola caratteristica che per diverse caratteristiche, anche contemporaneamente.

Significato simbolico o rilevanza particolare …Le guerre d'opinione possono iniziare!…. Va ricordato che una pessima fotografia di un soggetto difficilissimo da fotografare è sicuramente migliore di un'immagine ordinaria e tradizionale (come un comune tramonto).

Le immagini possono essere scelte da un fotografo o da un osservatore anche per motivi culturali, tenendo però sempre conto del contesto dello scatto e non di quello dell'osservatore. Un'immagine inoltre può "parlare" alle persone e avere la capacità di evocare emozioni, che tuttavia non devono essere necessariamente piacevoli.

Per ottimizzare le possibilità di successo delle candidature delle tue immagini è consigliabile leggere le linee guida complete.

Come candidare un'immagine

Se credi di aver trovato o creato un immagine che può essere presa in considerazione per la vetrina, che abbia una appropriata descrizione e una licenza adeguata, allora segui queste indicazioni.

Punto 1: copia il nome dell'immagine dentro la casella di testo (includendo anche il prefisso Image: ) a seguito del testo già presente nella casella (per esempio Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG.) ed infine clicca il pulsante candida una nuova immagine.

Punto 2: segui le istruzioni della pagina alla quale vieni collegato e salva le modifiche apportate.

Punto 3: inserisci manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata in cima alla lista candidati: Clicca qui e aggiungi il testo che segue all'inizio della lista di candidature:

{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:IL-NOME-DELLA-TUA-IMMAGINE.JPG}}

Votare

Per votare puoi usare i seguenti templates:

{{A favore}} ( Support) per supportare la candidatura,
{{Contrario}} ( Oppose) per opporsi alla candidatura,
{{Neutrale}} ( Neutral) per esprimere un parere neutrale,
{{Commento}} ( Comment) per esprimere solo un commento,
{{Info}} ( Info) per aggiungere delle informazioni riguardanti l'immagine,
{{Domanda}} ( Question) per chiedere informazioni.

Puoi inoltre evidenziare che l'immagine non ha possibilità di essere eletta con il template {{FPX|motivo}}, inserendo al posto di motivo le ragioni per cui è chiaramente inaccettabile per la vetrina.

Ogni votante è pregato di motivare il proprio voto con qualche parola, in particolar modo se si vota contro. Ricorda inoltre di aggiungere la tua firma (~~~~). I voti anonimi non sono accettati.

Candidare un'immagine alla rimozione dalla vetrina

Gli standard della vetrina cambiano col tempo. Può succedere che un'immagine che era stata eletta per la vetrina non sia più adatta agli standard attuali.

Questa lista è perciò composta dalle immagini considerate non più adatte a rimanere nella vetrina. Vota:

{{Mantenere}} Keep per far sì che l'immagine rimanga nella vetrina.
{{Rimuovere}} Oppose per far sì che l'immagine venga rimossa dalla vetrina.

Se consideri che un'immagine non rispetti più i criteri delle immagini in vetrina, candidala per la rimozione copiando il nome dell'immagine dentro questa casella di testo (includendo il prefisso dell' Image:) a seguito del testo già presente in essa:

Nella pagina appena creata includi:

Le informazioni sull'origine dell'immagine (autore dell'immagine, autore della candidatura);
Un collegamento all'iniziale candidatura per l'inserimento nella vetrina (che va inserito sotto ==Collegamenti== nella descrizione dell'immagine);
Il motivo per cui l'hai candidata per la rimozione dalla vetrina e il tuo Nome utente.

Dopo aver fatto ciò devi inserire manualmente un collegamento alla pagina creata all'inizio della lista di rimozione dalla vetrina.

Politica di elezione per la vetrina

Regole generali

Il periodo di votazione è di 9 giorni completi, a partire dalla candidatura. I risultato verrà determinato alla fine di questo periodo. I voti aggiunti il decimo giorno o a seguito non verranno considerati.
Sono benvenuti i contributori anonimi.
I contributi di anonimi alle discussioni sono benvenuti.
I voti di contributori anonimi non saranno accettati.
La candidatura non conta come voto. Il voto di supporto va esplicitato.
Gli autori delle candidature possono ritirare le loro immagini candidate in ogni momento. Questo si ottiene scrivendo semplicemente "I withdraw my nomination" (in inglese: ritiro la mia candidatura)
o aggiungendo il testo {{withdraw|~~~~}}.
Ricorda che l'obiettivo del progetto Wikimedia Commons è di costruire una raccolta di immagini utilizzabili da tutti i progetti Wikimedia, inclusi possibili progetti futuri. Perciò non bisogna pensare che questo sia una raccolta dedicata esclusivamente al progetto Wikipedia e per tanto le immagini non vanno valutate in funzione di ciò.
Le immagini vengono rimosse dalla lista di candidature se non hanno voti a supporto (escluso quello dell'autore della candidatura) entro il quinto giorno dalla candidatura (La regola del quinto giorno)
Le immagini dotate del template {{FPX}} non devono essere rimosse dalla lista entro le 48 ore successive al momento in cui è stato applicato il template, purchè non vi sia nessun voto a supporto oltre quello dell'autore della candidatura.

Regole di ammissione e rimozione dalla vetrina

Un'immagine candidata viene ammessa alla vetrina se si verificano le seguenti condizioni:

La licenza è adeguata (ovviamente).
Se ha almeno 5 voti a supporto.
Se il rapporto tra voti pro/contro è almeno 2/1 (se ha due terzi di maggioranza).
Non possono essere ammessi alla vetrina diverse versioni della stessa immagine, ne deve essere scelta una sola versione.

I criteri per la rimozione dalla vetrina sono gli stessi per l'ammissione ad essa, compreso il periodo di voto e la regola del quinto giorno (vedi nelle Regole generali).

Ogni utente esperto può portare a termine una votazione: per istruzioni su come compiere questa operazione vedi la guida per portare a termina la votazione.

Infine, sii cortese

Per piacere non dimenticare che l'immagine che stai giudicando è frutto del lavoro di qualcuno. Evita di usare frasi come è orribile: se devi opporti non fare spiacevoli considerazioni. Inoltre ricorda che è necessario scrivere in inglese se vuoi essere compreso dagli altri utenti e che il tuo utilizzo di questa lingua e quello degli altri utenti può comunque generare incomprensioni se non si ha un'ottima conoscenza, perciò scegli le parole con cura.

Buon voto… e ricorda che.... tutte le regole possono avere qualche eccezione.

Vedi anche

Per modificare la lista di candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
Per una lista cronologica delle candidature: Commons:Featured_pictures/chronological
Per un archivio delle precedenti candidature: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log
Per istruzioni su come portare a termine una procedura di voto: Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished
Lista di termini base del linguaggio fotografico
Candidature per le immagini di qualità
Critica fotografica
Guida alla scansione

Indice

Candidati per la vetrina

Aggiorna la pagina: purge this page's cache

Shortcut

COM:FPC/CL

Featured picture candidates

File:Calamar de arrecifes (Sepioteuthis lessoniana), Nosy Iranja, Madagascar, 2025-09-17, DD 134.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:40:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Cephalopoda
Info Bigfin reef squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana), Nosy Iranja, Madagascar. Note: there are no FPs of this species on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand-duc ascalaphe Oued Tataouine (Bubo ascalaphus).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:05:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed – uploaded by El Golli Mohamed – nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Superbass (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:CADAVRES DE VACHES.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:01:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roques de García - pāhoehoe cascade.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 18:57:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary_Islands
Info: pāhoehoe lava cascade flowing over the Roques de García, Tiede National Park; all by The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Superbass (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Technically quite good, though the mountain peak on the middle-left is slightly out of focus. Somehow perspective and composition lack depth and a point of reference for scale; in this context, the panoramic format may not be the best choice, as it emphasizes the two-dimensionality of the image. As a result, the photo unfortunately appears flat and frontal, and less striking than the subject deserves.[reply]

File:158 Female Northern red-billed hornbill in Etosha National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 14:33:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Bucerotidae (Hornbills)
Info High quality and strong composition; no FPs of this species. created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beautiful nature JackyM59 (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Many thanks for the nomination! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
And thanks for this shoot Wilfredor (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:MG-c12-008 (Francisco Bollini)-colored1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 12:26:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People
Info created by AnonymousUnknown author – uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 12:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarate--Ezarateesteban 11:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andrène agile.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 10:54:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

merci beaucoup SAIDI Ismail (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice photo, but the other photos in the category don't show such a blue insect. Experts will no doubt offer their opinions. -- JackyM59 (talk) 11:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your feedback; the blue issue has been fixed. SAIDI Ismail (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crepuscular rays over La Gomera1.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 10:52:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Crepuscular_rays
Info: crepuscular rays over La Gomera, Canarias, Spain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Архангельское, церковь на рассвете.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 09:38:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created by User:Елена Нечипоренко – uploaded by User:Елена Нечипоренко – nominated by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! Юрий Д.К. 18:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. While the church itself is beautifully lit by the sunrise and the atmosphere is pleasant, the large dark shadow in the lower part of the image is quite distracting and occupies too much space. --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arbre a Ain Drahem Tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 07:30:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Atef Ouni – uploaded by Atef Ouni – nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Atef Ouni: Hi, Please fill up the nomination properly. The gallery is missing above. Also we need a meaningful name, much more information, and proper category for where and what: Location? Tree identification? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Done for the Gallery and I request name change Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good. I renamed your nomination. Now could you please add geolocation to your picture? And this cannot be a featured picture unless the tree species is identified. Yann (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
OK, merci. J'ai renommé votre nomination. Maintenant, pourriez-vous ajouter la Géolocalisation à votre photo? Et elle ne peut être promue sans identification de l'espèce de l'arbre ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm sorry, but I see nothing expectional here. Furthermore the person and the surroudings (bark) are unsharp Poco a poco (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-winged Kite in Tal Chhapar Sanctuary November 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 06:01:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Family_:_Accipitridae_(Buzzards,_eagles,_hawks,_sparrowhawks_and_kites)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:08, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I love this picture of a beautifull Eagle, but even though cropping is normal in bird telephoto photography, this one is an extreme crop, the final image uses only 13% of the sensor’s pixels --Wilfredor (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Црква „Св. Леонтиј“ - Водоча 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 05:46:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info This perspective offers the best view of this early Byzantine basilica, which was built from the 4th to the 5th centuries. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is impossible for me not to support this image, and I think you know why. --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent motif, angle, light, and high resolution. Image quality could be better but other factors outweigh that. Cmao20 (talk) 11:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mochlos-Sitia-Crete-1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 14:01:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mochlos island (Agios Nikolaos). Sitia, Crete, Greece.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Greece
Info Mochlos island (Agios Nikolaos) in the evening with the archaeological excavation site where the excavations continue to this day. Low light shots of this island are quite rare. created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 17:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The horizon should be levelled.--Ermell (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a new version. Is it better now? Petro Stelte (talk) 21:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support pleasing mix of artificial and natural light — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:58, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ocean-related photos are my Achilles’ heel. I spent time looking at this image, searching for some detail in the sky, in the water, or somewhere else that would make it special, but I couldn’t find one. Instead, I see a centered photo that feels monotonous from top to bottom. That said, the shadow makes me question how good this photo really is—not because of what it shows, but because of what it doesn’t show. It is an abstract photo that invites the imagination; I can almost see a lighthouse and a psychiatric hospital in it. --Wilfredor (talk) 02:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice calm low-key mood. A daring nomination because I would have expected it to get picked apart for technical flaws owing to the low light - pleased to see reviewers are more open minded. Cmao20 (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, nice mood, a touch of mystery – a nice change from the usual “full sun” photographs of Greece. – Aristeas (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goya - Portrait de Luis María de Cistué y Martínez (1788-1842), 1790, RF 2009 5.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 13:59:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Portraits, paintings_of_males
Info created by Francisco Goya – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Portrait of Luis María de Cistué y Martínez by Francisco de Goya (1791), Louvre Museum -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good example of breeching, nice repro. JayCubby (talk) 19:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Остатоци од џамија во Доброшинци 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 07:11:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info Once used for religious purposes, now it is a nesting spot for birds. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lyndon Johnson signing Civil Rights Act, July 2, 1964.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 05:48:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1960-
Info a work of an employee of the Executive Office of the President of the United States – uploaded by Tom – nominated by وسيم -- Wassim^talk 05:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator Wassim^talk 05:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment white border at bottom, a bit noisy and dark but historical value --Ezarateesteban 12:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 15.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 00:20:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
Info created by W.carter – uploaded by W.carter – nominated by Pine. See also Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magenta G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 11.jpg by W.carter. Photo 11 is valuable for showing the vertical view, and I believe this one complements it by showing a view of the horizon. ↠Pine (✉) 00:20, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ↠Pine (✉) 00:20, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~oppose - vertical light must be vertical, needs perspective correction~~ — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Rhododendrites and others: Before this gets bogged down in a discussion about perspective correction, let me clarify this. The beams were not coming "straight down" when this photo was taken, they emanated from a point a little above the photo (you can extrapolate the rays). This was the most crazy aurora I've ever witnessed, with some features that don't occur during normal auroras. Like I stated on the file page, it was like standing under a dome of light, with rays coming from a center above me. That's why I could get photos like this where you can clearly see the point of origin of the aurora rays. We don't usually get that at my latitude. The normal thing is that it's centered above the north pole and the we get the aurora formation commonly called "the doughnut", a round "blob" circling the North Pole, and we see drapes.

But this night was different. When the front of the aurora passed over Russia, at least two vortexes were separated from the main doughnut. These resulted in smaller "domes" that stayed stable while they passed over Europe, but dissipated once the reached the Atlantic. You can see these vortexes in the satellite image from NASA. In that image, they are roughly over Saratov and Salavat in southern Russia. One of these vortexes passed over Lysekil where I was, and another one passed over Poland and Germany, giving both a very nice view of this aurora. Another crazy effect of these vortexes, was that when I aimed the camera to the north, where the aurora usually is, there was very little activity there. I even took som reference photos as proof: 1, 2; while facing south, the sky was literally on fire. It was a crazy night! --Cart (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, Cart, that was meant as FPC satire. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:10, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but better safe than sorry. We all know how things can turn out here when ideas are planted in people's brains. ;) --Cart (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful colors -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! Юрий Д.К. 18:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:KF-21 Boramae First Production.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 00:06:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
Info created by Ministry of National Defense of the Republic of Korea – uploaded by MintSkyBlue – nominated by Pine ↠Pine (✉) 00:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ↠Pine (✉) 00:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 06:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-tailed squirrel (Sciurus granatensis chrysuros) Caldas 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 17:53:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info One FP of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:50, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 08:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support

File:বসন্তের পরশ.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 10:11:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Basanta Utsav (Bengali spring festival), Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. created by Rg3300518 – uploaded by Rg3300518 – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 12:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice composition and motive, but satured --Wilfredor (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Question What happened to her face? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:47, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice composition but IMO way oversaturated. I think the photo editing has gone a little far here. Cmao20 (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pisipere Ahja jõe ürgorus.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 01:54:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Mergus
Info created & uploaded by Kylli28 – nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You should ask the photographer to correct saturation and tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:58, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice shot, but oversaturated. --Mile (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, nice mood but very oversatured, tilted, and vignetting. Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chrysanthemum flowers, specifically a variety known for its bi-color blooms with striped pink and white petals.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 17:31:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Asteraceae
Info All by -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:51, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info Why an image of a 21Mpix camera only in 4 Mpix? -- -donald- (talk) 04:28, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Valid question. I ‘ve noticed this problem after editing and uploading through my iPhone. May be some ios issue. RAW file is safe with my camera. Shall upload later. Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 04:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I am torn. The strong shadows and small resolution are not points in its favour, but I do like the composition and colours, and I think the harshness of the light actually brings out the bi-colour nature of the flowers quite nicely. Cmao20 (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 001.jpg

Voting period ends on Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:31:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada
Info In America, we do not have as many ancient and majestic cathedrals as in Europe, but the historical and architectural importance of Holy Trinity Cathedral in Quebec City is significant: it was the first Anglican cathedral built outside the British Isles and a monument to the establishment of the Church of England in Canada after the Conquest, in a city where all the other churches were French Catholic. My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:52, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to get an elevated perspective. I think you got the gallery wrong though - changed now. Cmao20 (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandelbrot Set Image 91.png

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 14:50:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
Info The Mandelbrot set exists independently of our minds and technologies. It is an infinite mathematical structure that has always existed. Computers do not create it; they merely act as a camera. This is a high-resolution, 90-megapixel fragment rendered with True SSAA 8x8 (64 independent samples per pixel), where the blue swirling rays look incredibly like... Created, uploaded and nominated by Aokoroko -- Aokoroko (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aokoroko (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good picture User97104 (talk) 14:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Sorry but needs ≥10d/≥100 edits, has 170d / 48 edits --Wilfredor (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good minibrot capture with high resolution, plenty of Misiurewicz points and nice symmetry --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another psychedelic and buddha like mandala --Wilfredor (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chouette du Maghreb.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 10:30:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Branches in the way. JayCubby (talk) 16:00, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the main subject is just too distractingly obscured Cmao20 (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siskin - Male - Spinus spinus3.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 09:53:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Fringillidae
Info Spinus spinus in Scotland. Сreated by Caroline Legg – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:18, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 01:56, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not just a high quality bird pic but a great composition. I find this picture really satisfying. Cmao20 (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow - 2026 - Bas-relief of the monument to Minin and Pozharsky (panorama).jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 09:50:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info Monument to Minin and Pozharsky in Moscow - Front bas-relief. My photo Юрий Д.К. 09:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:14, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:12, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:20260510 Aidan NZ93134.jpg

Voting period ends on Mon, 08 Jun 2026 04:41:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info @User:Ailura wanted me to nominate this cute little portrait of the maltesian singer Aidan at the turquoise carpet on May 10th 2026. My own work. --Granada (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expressive portrait with strong presence. The striking outfit and hat add clear visual impact. Sufficient bokeh helps isolate the subject; overall a striking event portrait. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good-looking man with a nice Spanish-like outfit. ★ 01:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait. --Yann (talk) 04:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ailura (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:05, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The right side of the outfit almost looks like a giant rose. He is a famous singer. The shadow bothers me a little, but it does not cover his face. It is a lovely photo of a handsome man --Wilfredor (talk) 11:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In fact it is intended to look like a rose, feel free to take a look at the other photos of him during the turquoise carpet 2026: Category:Malta in the Eurovision Song Contest 2026. --Granada (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I just watched them, although they're nowhere near as high quality as this one. Thanks for share Wilfredor (talk) 00:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- E bailey (talk) 17:29, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloeiwijze Rhododendron (Rhododendron ponticum). 19-05-2026 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 04:19:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Ericaceae
Info Inflorescence of a Rhododendron ponticum Focus stack of 69 photos. (Diameter flower ~60mm.)}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:25, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:53, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cosmos bipinnatus in Jardin universitaire Roger-Van den Hende, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada.jpg

Voting period ends on Sun, 07 Jun 2026 22:10:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info I am the photographer. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A near-perfect flower portrait Cmao20 (talk) 22:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:05, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:23, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love flowers. --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Van Buren by Mathew Brady c1855-58 sepia original restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 17:57:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1840-1849
Info created by Mathew Brady – uploaded, restored and by nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Careful restoration of the famous portrait of Martin Van Buren by Mathew Brady, from the original. Another version (black & white converted version) is already featured in the English wikipedia, but not in Commons. My proposal was done by hand only, with GIMP. I have enhanced the size, the sharpness with the low-pass filter technique, and cloned out all the scratches, tears, spots, and other damages by cloning out technique. -- Jebulon (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support! Wassim^talk 05:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barcelona Cityscape Panorama - Jan 2007 edit.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 16:38:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info created and initially uploaded by Diliff – edited by Julia W – nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good Diliff's 2007 image. -- ★ 16:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Some minor OOF foliage in the lower left corner, but very excusable given what the image is. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A shame about the out of focus area in the bottom left corner, and in general I miss an outstanding composition. I often find this with ultra-wide panoramas - that they miss a clear composition and are instead just a wide frame showing a lot of...stuff. The picture is also clearly downsized, which was normal in 2007 when Diliff uploaded this because internet connections were not as fast then as they are now, but 2000px vertical resolution is a little low. Finally, I think the light is quite flat. There are lots of interesting details as usual for Diliff photos but not FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brest Fortress Church of Saint Nicholas 2023-04-23 3554.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 14:43:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belarus
Info I find this church beautiful and I think it has been photographed well, with nice light. No FPs of this subject. The correct gallery will need to be created if this passes, as there are no church FPs from this country so far; I will handle that. created by Mike1979 Russia – uploaded by Mike1979 Russia – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support More FPs of Belarus! ★ 16:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If promoted, it will be our first FP of a church from Belarus. Cmao20 (talk) 20:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree that the church is beautiful and photographed well, but this picture taken by the same photographer on the same day looks more representative. In my opinion, a simpler composition with no disturbing elements, such as the people near the right edge and the large tree obscuring the western side of the church, is more compelling. At the end of the day, both pictures may be featurable. I just wanted to point out to another picture of the same subject. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think both have their advantages but this one is the clearer FP to me. The other one doesn't show as many interesting features of the church, such as the dramatic western facade, and makes the whole building appear somewhat short and squat, whereas the picture I nominated has the church elevated at the top of the steps and lit with warmer light, which makes it look much more inspiring. I won't offer an alternative as I am not convinced the other is an FP but others are of course welcome to nominate it if they disagree with my appraisal. Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Imo both photos deserves FP star Юрий Д.К. 21:51, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 User97104 (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Vote struck: the user has completed only 48 of the required 100 edits so far. Sorry. ,-- Radomianin (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:56, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:13, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Узор на потолке мечети Баланд 6.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 08:53:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Uzbekistan
Info Baland Mosque ceiling pattern. Bukhara, Uzbekistan, created by Spartak22 – nominated by -- Mile (talk) 08:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info 2024 WLM Uzbekistan winner. Made with older camera Cannon EOS 1100D on 12 MPx, but more than fine. Very nice colors.
Support -- Mile (talk) 08:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours, subject, fully agree that resolution and quality are fine Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks like a horizontal perspective correction is needed. Notice at the top how the spacing between the concrete and the start of the tiles is uneven left top corner vs left top corner --Wilfredor (talk) 16:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree with Wilfredor. Also, personally I'd indicate how old the mosque is to better approximate the age of the painting (and the rights status).16:52, 29 May 2026 (UTC) comment from Crisco 1492 --Wilfredor (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2026 (UTC) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2026 (UTC) signed now, thanks[reply]
Info Made 500 years ago, colored in 19th century, as written on Wiki. I think middle line is just like that. Was there (in UZB) and said before, when you think on mistake you might be wrong. If i move left, vertical middle line would go even more to clockwise,but i see should go anticlock. Since we havent see or been there to check it... let it stay as it is. Also will show "unlucky simmetry" on my shots in UZB. --Mile (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Based on Mile's comments, if the author thinks that's the case, he'll correct it. I honestly didn't realize that the nominator wasn't the author. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please, improve the symmetry, it's tilted Poco a poco (talk) 10:14, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since it is in finished contest WLM, and not my shot, i will leave as it is. Maybe we become too "technincal" here of FP and forgot on beauty of pic.--Mile (talk) 07:13, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Poco, but I also disagree with editing an image, especially one that's the winner of WLM, without the author's supervision. Perhaps someone could edit it and create an alt version? Wilfredor (talk) 00:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:15, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charançon rouge des palmiers (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 14:51:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Curculionidae_(Snout_Beetles/Weevils)
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 20:06, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:26, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, merci beaucoup SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erithacus rubecula mating 628463896.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 23:17:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Muscicapidae#Genus_:_Erithacus
Info Ten current FPs but this is the first image of their mating on commons. Created by Interaccoonale – uploaded by Interaccoonale – nominated by Interaccoonale -- ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a high-quality capture of European robins mating. I selected this frame as the main nomination because it offers the best side-profile composition and educational value. However, this is part of a serial shoot. I have other frames from the same sequence available if the community wishes to see or consider an "Alternative." -- ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this image was uploaded to this site through iNaturalist2Commons and subsequently updated from my local disk. I've added a link to my user page on my iNaturalist profile to prove the copyright ownership. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very beautifull moment, but IMHO heavy JPEG compression (try export it in full quality) and out of focus the top bird. I will change my vote if the JPEG is exported in better quality --Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The compression level is 95. It is not a compression. I think what you're talking about is the side effects of denoising. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 07:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely right Wilfredor (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very good image but unfortunately the cropping of the wing at the top kills it for me. Sorry. --Espandero (talk) 06:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I also worried about it when choosing this file. I personally preferred this one because I thought its wing was full of movement, being very energetic. I am proposing an alternative showing the whole birds and both of them are more in focus.––Interaccoonale (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Comment: This is an alternative as suggested by Wilfredor and Espandero, ensuring that both birds are completely in the frame and are both in focus.––Interaccoonale (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a nice moment captured well, but the image could benefit from some processing to clarify/brighten things up. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
alt 2 Exccelent now and ok to me, thanks for upload this version --Wilfredor (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Espandero (talk) 06:08, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:33, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the alternative. – Aristeas (talk) 13:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version is FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I forgot that I can vote for my own work. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 22:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The WB looks off Poco a poco (talk) 10:16, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's well. Can you explain it in detail? Is it too cool or too warm? ––Interaccoonale (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:16, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Travessa Couto Fernandes 60 Centro São Luís 2025-6016.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 21:36:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info created and uploaded by Prburley – nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 21:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Need perspective fix, look the space on top right corner and bottom right corner --Wilfredor (talk) 00:35, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Wilfredor and I do not really see the “wow factor” expected for a Featured Picture --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Visibly not straight, perspective needs to be fixed, and odd/arbitrary crop. Cmao20 (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @★: Here is a cropped version with perspective correction; if you like it, you could nominate it as an alternative. However please note (everybody) that it is difficult/impossible to achieve complete symmetry – the tiles themselves are not perfectly symmetric. – Aristeas (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! ★ 16:23, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Support ★ 16:25, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better. Cmao20 (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This way it works for me. Thank you for nominating it. – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Convincing geometric rhythm; structural repetition creates a satisfying visual order. As a member of the Pattern Appreciation Society, this is exactly the kind of visual structure I tend to appreciate ;) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:42, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
alt 2 --Wilfredor (talk) 02:36, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:53, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carly Pearce performing at Hogs for Hospice, Leamington, Ontario, 2025-08-01 53.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 19:22:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created & uploaded by Crisco 1492 – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'll be honest, I'd wanted to nominate this - just wasn't sure it was up to the high standards demanded here. Thanks for making the nomination. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice --Ezarateesteban 11:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not a portrait, but an action shot and the microphone spoils the view, it's a bit too much obstructing her face. For an action shot it does not wow me, especially from her facial expression. --Granada (talk) 15:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Granada --Wilfredor (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- E bailey (talk) 04:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is definitely a good and high-quality image, but something feels missing from FP. The framing also rubs me the wrong way, not even sure why. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de San Agustín, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 17:44:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Paris
Info Church of Saint Augustin, Paris, France. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent play with the unavoidable distorsion. Very good, and I know the place ! --Jebulon (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose composition is not ideal for FP distracting foreground elements, awkward chandelier crop, and very strong wide-angle distortion reduce the overall visual balance. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Olfa Yakoubi --Tagooty (talk) 06:18, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good wide angle view in high quality.--Ermell (talk) 06:28, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support crop chairs in bottom, to start bellow first step, so chairs wont disturb and view is more clear. --Mile (talk) 07:19, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO opposing this for the perspective distortion is somewhat close-minded, sorry to say. Not every picture needs to be perspective-corrected to death. This picture instead chooses to highlight the perspective distortion as a feature to illustrate the imposing scale of the building, which is an entirely valid approach. Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assessment, Cmao20, but I think the motivation for the vote is not based on the picture itselft. I just realised that when I went through all current FP candidates yesterday morning I opposed the 2 noms of Olfa Yakoubi because none of them convinced me in terms of level of detail. The first edit he/she did afterwards was coming here to oppose this candidate (and second oppose in his FP record, what are the odds?). Definitely unfair but nothing unusual. Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Se que no podemos prevenir esto, pero al menos conmigo, votame todo lo negativo que puedas, nunca hare eso. Aunque a veces pudiera estar equivocado intento ser lo mas objetivo posible Wilfredor (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’m really disappointed and honestly hurt by your comment, Diego. Reading that my vote could be interpreted as revenge or retaliation was painful for me, because that is not how I participate in FP discussions at all.

I can’t imagine that you would think my oppose is related to the fact that you opposed some pictures I nominated — especially since this not even mine photo. I always try to give my opinion based on the image itself and according to my understanding of FP criteria, even when my opinion may differ from others.

I still don’t like the composition of this photo. In my opinion, the framing is not ideal, the foreground elements are distracting, and the brightness and distortion affect the overall visual balance. That is why I opposed it, and I still stand by my opinion sincerely and in good faith.

What hurt me the most is the implication that my opinion was dishonest or motivated by personal feelings. I respect your work and your contributions a lot. In fact, I have supported some of your photos before, and there are also photos of yours that I personally don’t like but chose not to oppose because I respect different artistic views and standards.

By the way, we already met before — I don’t know if you remember — and I genuinely appreciate your photography overall. That is also why this statement was painful for me to read. Even when we disagree on a nomination, I believe we should assume good faith and respect each other’s opinions.

And honestly, after reading your comment, I no longer feel comfortable voting on your photos in the future if my opinions are going to be interpreted this way instead of being seen as sincere photographic criticism.

For this specific picture, I simply do not think it reaches FP level, and my vote was made honestly, sincerely, and without any personal intention. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 17:46, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think that what Diego commented is not what he meant, remember that his level of English is not very good and he could use very direct or incorrect words, there is also the cultural difference. Wilfredor (talk) 19:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please Wilfredor, don't talk for me about what I meant or not. I don't think either, that you are the most appropiate person to judge my level of English. I meant what I wrote, because although I don't know Olfa Yokoubi, I've often seen this behavior very often in the almost last 20 years. That's why I wonder about the odds that the first edit after my 2 opposes is right away a decline here. Olfa, you will have to recognize that if my opposes didn't play a role in your oppose it looks at least suspicious. Still I'm happy to read that you confirm otherwise. Poco a poco (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your English is absolutely fine, Poco. Best to leave this whole nonsensical discussion. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, Poco poco; it wasn't my place to interpret what you meant or judge your English. I'm sorry, it was a mistake on my part. I'll leave Wilfredor (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, Cmao20, let's move on Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support The way the chairs are cut off at the bottom is a bit annoying; I would have cut it at the level of the stairs, but that's more of a personal decision than a technically valid one. The chandelier also obstructs the view of the dome, but I understand it's a necessary sacrifice since it's not something that can be removed. Thank you for this nomination. I have a similar one from another church, and I had my doubts about whether this type of composition would be accepted, but I agree that not all wide-angle distortion needs to be corrected, especially if the result would create a completely disproportionate image. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 13:13, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:48, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Olfa, great quality and the wide angle doesn't bother me much but the image does have distracting elements (chairs and chandelier) and I'm unconvinced by the crop. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:41, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Argiope lobata - 08-2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 18:32:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family_:_Araneidae_(Orb-weaver_Spiders)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 04:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMHO Overexposed and lack of DoF and focus --Wilfredor (talk) 11:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback.

Really overexposed? I don't think so.

The depth of field is shallow, admittedly, but I think it's fine.

Thanks Skander zarrad (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I like the picture and it’s not strongly overexposed to the point of burning out the photo, but some areas could have more texture if they were slightly less bright. There’s a fine line between what is acceptable and what isn’t, so take this more as my personal opinion than as an absolute truth. In short, don’t take it too seriously. Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:21, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:13, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common redshank (Tringa totanus) breeding Marken.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 17:09:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Tringa
Info Two current FPs, one and two. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Question Technically excellent, but I was recently told that FPC should be « the Best of Commons ». Should we have three « Best of Commons » pictures of the same bird ? --Jebulon (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We do have a delist procedure, but not sure that is appropriate here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:35, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As they are different, I would keep 02 and this one; delist 01. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support No point punishing this picture because worse FPs exist of the same species Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. “Best of Commons” does not mean “the best photos of each subject” – for that we have got VI –, it means “the best images on Commons”. If we have 10 great and wonderful photos of species A and only 1 mediocre photo of species B, we can feature all 10 great photos of species A, if they are really great and are sufficiently different (showing different aspects/perspectives/poses/subspecies/… of species A), but must not feature the mediocre photo of species B; the latter should become a VI for species B, of course. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Best in the scope, hight quality, used on WP. Please fix the space color than look Uncalibrated --Wilfredor (talk) 21:54, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Small Minivet in Saswad August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 05:02:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Campephagidae_(Cuckooshrikes_and_allies)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:56, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:46, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good composition, but detail below the bar for such perched birds. --Tagooty (talk) 06:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not very sharp compared to the standard for this type of bird photography in FPC, image heavily cropped or downsized compared to the size that the sensor delivers. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks fine to me, and yes of course it is cropped, most wildlife photographs are...Cmao20 (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The orange of the breast contrasts very pleasingly with the green background LetmeEditit (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition and colour contrast. Feather details appear a bit soft, but I guess we are spoiled a bit by the heavy AI sharpening many wildlife photographs use today and Tisha just did not apply such strong sharpening. So in the end the photo is possibly not softer, just less processed than other candidates. – Aristeas (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Candidati per la rimozione dalla vetrina

Shortcut

COM:FPC/CL

Featured picture candidates

File:Calamar de arrecifes (Sepioteuthis lessoniana), Nosy Iranja, Madagascar, 2025-09-17, DD 134.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:40:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Cephalopoda
Info Bigfin reef squid (Sepioteuthis lessoniana), Nosy Iranja, Madagascar. Note: there are no FPs of this species on Commons. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand-duc ascalaphe Oued Tataouine (Bubo ascalaphus).jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:05:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family : Strigidae (True Owls)
Info created by El Golli Mohamed – uploaded by El Golli Mohamed – nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Superbass (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:CADAVRES DE VACHES.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 20:01:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:18, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roques de García - pāhoehoe cascade.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 18:57:47 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary_Islands
Info: pāhoehoe lava cascade flowing over the Roques de García, Tiede National Park; all by The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Superbass (talk) 21:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC) Technically quite good, though the mountain peak on the middle-left is slightly out of focus. Somehow perspective and composition lack depth and a point of reference for scale; in this context, the panoramic format may not be the best choice, as it emphasizes the two-dimensionality of the image. As a result, the photo unfortunately appears flat and frontal, and less striking than the subject deserves.[reply]

File:158 Female Northern red-billed hornbill in Etosha National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 14:33:23 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Bucerotidae (Hornbills)
Info High quality and strong composition; no FPs of this species. created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beautiful nature JackyM59 (talk) 14:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Many thanks for the nomination! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
And thanks for this shoot Wilfredor (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support! --Berthold Werner (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:MG-c12-008 (Francisco Bollini)-colored1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 12:26:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People
Info created by AnonymousUnknown author – uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta – restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 12:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarate--Ezarateesteban 11:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andrène agile.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 10:54:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 10:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

merci beaucoup SAIDI Ismail (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support SAIDI Ismail (talk) 11:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice photo, but the other photos in the category don't show such a blue insect. Experts will no doubt offer their opinions. -- JackyM59 (talk) 11:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your feedback; the blue issue has been fixed. SAIDI Ismail (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crepuscular rays over La Gomera1.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 10:52:15 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Crepuscular_rays
Info: crepuscular rays over La Gomera, Canarias, Spain; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Архангельское, церковь на рассвете.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 09:38:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created by User:Елена Нечипоренко – uploaded by User:Елена Нечипоренко – nominated by Елена Нечипоренко -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! Юрий Д.К. 18:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. While the church itself is beautifully lit by the sunrise and the atmosphere is pleasant, the large dark shadow in the lower part of the image is quite distracting and occupies too much space. --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arbre a Ain Drahem Tunisie.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 07:30:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Atef Ouni – uploaded by Atef Ouni – nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Atef Ouni: Hi, Please fill up the nomination properly. The gallery is missing above. Also we need a meaningful name, much more information, and proper category for where and what: Location? Tree identification? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Done for the Gallery and I request name change Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good. I renamed your nomination. Now could you please add geolocation to your picture? And this cannot be a featured picture unless the tree species is identified. Yann (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
OK, merci. J'ai renommé votre nomination. Maintenant, pourriez-vous ajouter la Géolocalisation à votre photo? Et elle ne peut être promue sans identification de l'espèce de l'arbre ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm sorry, but I see nothing expectional here. Furthermore the person and the surroudings (bark) are unsharp Poco a poco (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Black-winged Kite in Tal Chhapar Sanctuary November 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 03.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 06:01:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Family_:_Accipitridae_(Buzzards,_eagles,_hawks,_sparrowhawks_and_kites)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:08, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I love this picture of a beautifull Eagle, but even though cropping is normal in bird telephoto photography, this one is an extreme crop, the final image uses only 13% of the sensor’s pixels --Wilfredor (talk) 15:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Црква „Св. Леонтиј“ - Водоча 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2026 at 05:46:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info This perspective offers the best view of this early Byzantine basilica, which was built from the 4th to the 5th centuries. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is impossible for me not to support this image, and I think you know why. --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent motif, angle, light, and high resolution. Image quality could be better but other factors outweigh that. Cmao20 (talk) 11:06, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mochlos-Sitia-Crete-1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 14:01:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Greece
Info Mochlos island (Agios Nikolaos) in the evening with the archaeological excavation site where the excavations continue to this day. Low light shots of this island are quite rare. created by Petro Stelte – uploaded by Petro Stelte – nominated by Petro Stelte -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Petro Stelte (talk) 14:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 17:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The horizon should be levelled.--Ermell (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I have uploaded a new version. Is it better now? Petro Stelte (talk) 21:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support pleasing mix of artificial and natural light — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:58, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ocean-related photos are my Achilles’ heel. I spent time looking at this image, searching for some detail in the sky, in the water, or somewhere else that would make it special, but I couldn’t find one. Instead, I see a centered photo that feels monotonous from top to bottom. That said, the shadow makes me question how good this photo really is—not because of what it shows, but because of what it doesn’t show. It is an abstract photo that invites the imagination; I can almost see a lighthouse and a psychiatric hospital in it. --Wilfredor (talk) 02:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice calm low-key mood. A daring nomination because I would have expected it to get picked apart for technical flaws owing to the low light - pleased to see reviewers are more open minded. Cmao20 (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, nice mood, a touch of mystery – a nice change from the usual “full sun” photographs of Greece. – Aristeas (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goya - Portrait de Luis María de Cistué y Martínez (1788-1842), 1790, RF 2009 5.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 13:59:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Portraits, paintings_of_males
Info created by Francisco Goya – uploaded by JackyM59 – nominated by JackyM59 -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Portrait of Luis María de Cistué y Martínez by Francisco de Goya (1791), Louvre Museum -- JackyM59 (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good example of breeching, nice repro. JayCubby (talk) 19:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Остатоци од џамија во Доброшинци 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 07:11:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info Once used for religious purposes, now it is a nesting spot for birds. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lyndon Johnson signing Civil Rights Act, July 2, 1964.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 05:48:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1960-
Info a work of an employee of the Executive Office of the President of the United States – uploaded by Tom – nominated by وسيم -- Wassim^talk 05:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator Wassim^talk 05:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment white border at bottom, a bit noisy and dark but historical value --Ezarateesteban 12:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 15.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 00:20:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
Info created by W.carter – uploaded by W.carter – nominated by Pine. See also Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magenta G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 11.jpg by W.carter. Photo 11 is valuable for showing the vertical view, and I believe this one complements it by showing a view of the horizon. ↠Pine (✉) 00:20, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ↠Pine (✉) 00:20, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~oppose - vertical light must be vertical, needs perspective correction~~ — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:57, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Rhododendrites and others: Before this gets bogged down in a discussion about perspective correction, let me clarify this. The beams were not coming "straight down" when this photo was taken, they emanated from a point a little above the photo (you can extrapolate the rays). This was the most crazy aurora I've ever witnessed, with some features that don't occur during normal auroras. Like I stated on the file page, it was like standing under a dome of light, with rays coming from a center above me. That's why I could get photos like this where you can clearly see the point of origin of the aurora rays. We don't usually get that at my latitude. The normal thing is that it's centered above the north pole and the we get the aurora formation commonly called "the doughnut", a round "blob" circling the North Pole, and we see drapes.

But this night was different. When the front of the aurora passed over Russia, at least two vortexes were separated from the main doughnut. These resulted in smaller "domes" that stayed stable while they passed over Europe, but dissipated once the reached the Atlantic. You can see these vortexes in the satellite image from NASA. In that image, they are roughly over Saratov and Salavat in southern Russia. One of these vortexes passed over Lysekil where I was, and another one passed over Poland and Germany, giving both a very nice view of this aurora. Another crazy effect of these vortexes, was that when I aimed the camera to the north, where the aurora usually is, there was very little activity there. I even took som reference photos as proof: 1, 2; while facing south, the sky was literally on fire. It was a crazy night! --Cart (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, Cart, that was meant as FPC satire. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:10, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, but better safe than sorry. We all know how things can turn out here when ideas are planted in people's brains. ;) --Cart (talk) 22:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful colors -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! Юрий Д.К. 18:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 19:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:KF-21 Boramae First Production.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2026 at 00:06:17 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
Info created by Ministry of National Defense of the Republic of Korea – uploaded by MintSkyBlue – nominated by Pine ↠Pine (✉) 00:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support ↠Pine (✉) 00:06, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:39, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jakubhal 06:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 11:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-tailed squirrel (Sciurus granatensis chrysuros) Caldas 2.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 17:53:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Sciuridae (Squirrels)
Info One FP of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:50, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 22:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 08:28, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 10:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 17:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support

File:বসন্তের পরশ.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 10:11:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info Basanta Utsav (Bengali spring festival), Rabindra Bharati University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. created by Rg3300518 – uploaded by Rg3300518 – nominated by Moheen -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:26, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 12:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice composition and motive, but satured --Wilfredor (talk) 14:23, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Question What happened to her face? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:47, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice composition but IMO way oversaturated. I think the photo editing has gone a little far here. Cmao20 (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pisipere Ahja jõe ürgorus.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2026 at 01:54:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Mergus
Info created & uploaded by Kylli28 – nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 01:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You should ask the photographer to correct saturation and tilt. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:58, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice shot, but oversaturated. --Mile (talk) 07:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, nice mood but very oversatured, tilted, and vignetting. Cmao20 (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chrysanthemum flowers, specifically a variety known for its bi-color blooms with striped pink and white petals.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 17:31:53 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Asteraceae
Info All by -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 17:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:51, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info Why an image of a 21Mpix camera only in 4 Mpix? -- -donald- (talk) 04:28, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Valid question. I ‘ve noticed this problem after editing and uploading through my iPhone. May be some ios issue. RAW file is safe with my camera. Shall upload later. Shagil Muzhappilangad (talk) 04:37, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I am torn. The strong shadows and small resolution are not points in its favour, but I do like the composition and colours, and I think the harshness of the light actually brings out the bi-colour nature of the flowers quite nicely. Cmao20 (talk) 10:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cathedral of the Holy Trinity, Quebec city, Canada 001.jpg

Voting period ends on Mon, 08 Jun 2026 16:31:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Canada
Info In America, we do not have as many ancient and majestic cathedrals as in Europe, but the historical and architectural importance of Holy Trinity Cathedral in Quebec City is significant: it was the first Anglican cathedral built outside the British Isles and a monument to the establishment of the Church of England in Canada after the Conquest, in a city where all the other churches were French Catholic. My own work. --Wilfredor (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 16:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 05:25, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 16:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:52, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to get an elevated perspective. I think you got the gallery wrong though - changed now. Cmao20 (talk) 10:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandelbrot Set Image 91.png

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 14:50:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
Info The Mandelbrot set exists independently of our minds and technologies. It is an infinite mathematical structure that has always existed. Computers do not create it; they merely act as a camera. This is a high-resolution, 90-megapixel fragment rendered with True SSAA 8x8 (64 independent samples per pixel), where the blue swirling rays look incredibly like... Created, uploaded and nominated by Aokoroko -- Aokoroko (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Aokoroko (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good picture User97104 (talk) 14:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC) Sorry but needs ≥10d/≥100 edits, has 170d / 48 edits --Wilfredor (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good minibrot capture with high resolution, plenty of Misiurewicz points and nice symmetry --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:41, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another psychedelic and buddha like mandala --Wilfredor (talk) 16:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chouette du Maghreb.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 10:30:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Strigidae_(True_Owls)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Branches in the way. JayCubby (talk) 16:00, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the main subject is just too distractingly obscured Cmao20 (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Siskin - Male - Spinus spinus3.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 09:53:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Fringillidae
Info Spinus spinus in Scotland. Сreated by Caroline Legg – uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 23:18, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 01:56, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 02:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:49, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:10, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:18, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not just a high quality bird pic but a great composition. I find this picture really satisfying. Cmao20 (talk) 10:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moscow - 2026 - Bas-relief of the monument to Minin and Pozharsky (panorama).jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 09:50:28 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info Monument to Minin and Pozharsky in Moscow - Front bas-relief. My photo Юрий Д.К. 09:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:09, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:04, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:14, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:53, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:12, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:20260510 Aidan NZ93134.jpg

Voting period ends on Mon, 08 Jun 2026 04:41:10 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info @User:Ailura wanted me to nominate this cute little portrait of the maltesian singer Aidan at the turquoise carpet on May 10th 2026. My own work. --Granada (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 06:41, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expressive portrait with strong presence. The striking outfit and hat add clear visual impact. Sufficient bokeh helps isolate the subject; overall a striking event portrait. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good-looking man with a nice Spanish-like outfit. ★ 01:23, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait. --Yann (talk) 04:24, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 08:01, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ailura (talk) 09:33, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:05, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The right side of the outfit almost looks like a giant rose. He is a famous singer. The shadow bothers me a little, but it does not cover his face. It is a lovely photo of a handsome man --Wilfredor (talk) 11:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
In fact it is intended to look like a rose, feel free to take a look at the other photos of him during the turquoise carpet 2026: Category:Malta in the Eurovision Song Contest 2026. --Granada (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I just watched them, although they're nowhere near as high quality as this one. Thanks for share Wilfredor (talk) 00:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- E bailey (talk) 17:29, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloeiwijze Rhododendron (Rhododendron ponticum). 19-05-2026 (d.j.b.).jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2026 at 04:19:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Ericaceae
Info Inflorescence of a Rhododendron ponticum Focus stack of 69 photos. (Diameter flower ~60mm.)}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:19, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:25, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:43, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 10:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:36, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 15:53, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cosmos bipinnatus in Jardin universitaire Roger-Van den Hende, Quebec city, Quebec, Canada.jpg

Voting period ends on Sun, 07 Jun 2026 22:10:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info I am the photographer. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:06, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A near-perfect flower portrait Cmao20 (talk) 22:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:47, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:05, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:54, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:23, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love flowers. --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 19:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martin Van Buren by Mathew Brady c1855-58 sepia original restored.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 17:57:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1840-1849
Info created by Mathew Brady – uploaded, restored and by nominated by Jebulon -- Jebulon (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Careful restoration of the famous portrait of Martin Van Buren by Mathew Brady, from the original. Another version (black & white converted version) is already featured in the English wikipedia, but not in Commons. My proposal was done by hand only, with GIMP. I have enhanced the size, the sharpness with the low-pass filter technique, and cloned out all the scratches, tears, spots, and other damages by cloning out technique. -- Jebulon (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support! Wassim^talk 05:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barcelona Cityscape Panorama - Jan 2007 edit.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 16:38:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Spain
Info created and initially uploaded by Diliff – edited by Julia W – nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good Diliff's 2007 image. -- ★ 16:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Some minor OOF foliage in the lower left corner, but very excusable given what the image is. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A shame about the out of focus area in the bottom left corner, and in general I miss an outstanding composition. I often find this with ultra-wide panoramas - that they miss a clear composition and are instead just a wide frame showing a lot of...stuff. The picture is also clearly downsized, which was normal in 2007 when Diliff uploaded this because internet connections were not as fast then as they are now, but 2000px vertical resolution is a little low. Finally, I think the light is quite flat. There are lots of interesting details as usual for Diliff photos but not FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brest Fortress Church of Saint Nicholas 2023-04-23 3554.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 14:43:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Belarus
Info I find this church beautiful and I think it has been photographed well, with nice light. No FPs of this subject. The correct gallery will need to be created if this passes, as there are no church FPs from this country so far; I will handle that. created by Mike1979 Russia – uploaded by Mike1979 Russia – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support More FPs of Belarus! ★ 16:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If promoted, it will be our first FP of a church from Belarus. Cmao20 (talk) 20:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I agree that the church is beautiful and photographed well, but this picture taken by the same photographer on the same day looks more representative. In my opinion, a simpler composition with no disturbing elements, such as the people near the right edge and the large tree obscuring the western side of the church, is more compelling. At the end of the day, both pictures may be featurable. I just wanted to point out to another picture of the same subject. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I think both have their advantages but this one is the clearer FP to me. The other one doesn't show as many interesting features of the church, such as the dramatic western facade, and makes the whole building appear somewhat short and squat, whereas the picture I nominated has the church elevated at the top of the steps and lit with warmer light, which makes it look much more inspiring. I won't offer an alternative as I am not convinced the other is an FP but others are of course welcome to nominate it if they disagree with my appraisal. Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Imo both photos deserves FP star Юрий Д.К. 21:51, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:26, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 User97104 (talk) 14:10, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Vote struck: the user has completed only 48 of the required 100 edits so far. Sorry. ,-- Radomianin (talk) 15:52, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:56, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:25, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:13, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 14:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Узор на потолке мечети Баланд 6.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2026 at 08:53:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#Uzbekistan
Info Baland Mosque ceiling pattern. Bukhara, Uzbekistan, created by Spartak22 – nominated by -- Mile (talk) 08:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Info 2024 WLM Uzbekistan winner. Made with older camera Cannon EOS 1100D on 12 MPx, but more than fine. Very nice colors.
Support -- Mile (talk) 08:53, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours, subject, fully agree that resolution and quality are fine Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks like a horizontal perspective correction is needed. Notice at the top how the spacing between the concrete and the start of the tiles is uneven left top corner vs left top corner --Wilfredor (talk) 16:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agree with Wilfredor. Also, personally I'd indicate how old the mosque is to better approximate the age of the painting (and the rights status).16:52, 29 May 2026 (UTC) comment from Crisco 1492 --Wilfredor (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2026 (UTC) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2026 (UTC) signed now, thanks[reply]
Info Made 500 years ago, colored in 19th century, as written on Wiki. I think middle line is just like that. Was there (in UZB) and said before, when you think on mistake you might be wrong. If i move left, vertical middle line would go even more to clockwise,but i see should go anticlock. Since we havent see or been there to check it... let it stay as it is. Also will show "unlucky simmetry" on my shots in UZB. --Mile (talk) 18:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Based on Mile's comments, if the author thinks that's the case, he'll correct it. I honestly didn't realize that the nominator wasn't the author. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:02, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please, improve the symmetry, it's tilted Poco a poco (talk) 10:14, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since it is in finished contest WLM, and not my shot, i will leave as it is. Maybe we become too "technincal" here of FP and forgot on beauty of pic.--Mile (talk) 07:13, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Poco, but I also disagree with editing an image, especially one that's the winner of WLM, without the author's supervision. Perhaps someone could edit it and create an alt version? Wilfredor (talk) 00:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:15, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:33, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:17, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charançon rouge des palmiers (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus).jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 14:51:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Curculionidae_(Snout_Beetles/Weevils)
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 20:06, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
thank you SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:26, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir, merci beaucoup SAIDI Ismail (talk) 20:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:40, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:01, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:50, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erithacus rubecula mating 628463896.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 23:17:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes/Muscicapidae#Genus_:_Erithacus
Info Ten current FPs but this is the first image of their mating on commons. Created by Interaccoonale – uploaded by Interaccoonale – nominated by Interaccoonale -- ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a high-quality capture of European robins mating. I selected this frame as the main nomination because it offers the best side-profile composition and educational value. However, this is part of a serial shoot. I have other frames from the same sequence available if the community wishes to see or consider an "Alternative." -- ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note: this image was uploaded to this site through iNaturalist2Commons and subsequently updated from my local disk. I've added a link to my user page on my iNaturalist profile to prove the copyright ownership. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 23:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very beautifull moment, but IMHO heavy JPEG compression (try export it in full quality) and out of focus the top bird. I will change my vote if the JPEG is exported in better quality --Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
The compression level is 95. It is not a compression. I think what you're talking about is the side effects of denoising. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 07:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely right Wilfredor (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose very good image but unfortunately the cropping of the wing at the top kills it for me. Sorry. --Espandero (talk) 06:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I also worried about it when choosing this file. I personally preferred this one because I thought its wing was full of movement, being very energetic. I am proposing an alternative showing the whole birds and both of them are more in focus.––Interaccoonale (talk) 06:58, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Comment: This is an alternative as suggested by Wilfredor and Espandero, ensuring that both birds are completely in the frame and are both in focus.––Interaccoonale (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a nice moment captured well, but the image could benefit from some processing to clarify/brighten things up. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
alt 2 Exccelent now and ok to me, thanks for upload this version --Wilfredor (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Espandero (talk) 06:08, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:33, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the alternative. – Aristeas (talk) 13:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version is FP Cmao20 (talk) 20:51, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I forgot that I can vote for my own work. ––Interaccoonale (talk) 22:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The WB looks off Poco a poco (talk) 10:16, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's well. Can you explain it in detail? Is it too cool or too warm? ––Interaccoonale (talk) 13:23, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:16, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:52, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Travessa Couto Fernandes 60 Centro São Luís 2025-6016.jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 21:36:00 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
Info created and uploaded by Prburley – nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ★ 21:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Need perspective fix, look the space on top right corner and bottom right corner --Wilfredor (talk) 00:35, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Wilfredor and I do not really see the “wow factor” expected for a Featured Picture --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Visibly not straight, perspective needs to be fixed, and odd/arbitrary crop. Cmao20 (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @★: Here is a cropped version with perspective correction; if you like it, you could nominate it as an alternative. However please note (everybody) that it is difficult/impossible to achieve complete symmetry – the tiles themselves are not perfectly symmetric. – Aristeas (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! ★ 16:23, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Support ★ 16:25, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better. Cmao20 (talk) 18:10, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support This way it works for me. Thank you for nominating it. – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 23:17, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Convincing geometric rhythm; structural repetition creates a satisfying visual order. As a member of the Pattern Appreciation Society, this is exactly the kind of visual structure I tend to appreciate ;) -- Radomianin (talk) 22:42, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
alt 2 --Wilfredor (talk) 02:36, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:53, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carly Pearce performing at Hogs for Hospice, Leamington, Ontario, 2025-08-01 53.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 19:22:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created & uploaded by Crisco 1492 – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'll be honest, I'd wanted to nominate this - just wasn't sure it was up to the high standards demanded here. Thanks for making the nomination. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice --Ezarateesteban 11:36, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's not a portrait, but an action shot and the microphone spoils the view, it's a bit too much obstructing her face. For an action shot it does not wow me, especially from her facial expression. --Granada (talk) 15:25, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:14, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Granada --Wilfredor (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- E bailey (talk) 04:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is definitely a good and high-quality image, but something feels missing from FP. The framing also rubs me the wrong way, not even sure why. Kruusamägi (talk) 02:03, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de San Agustín, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 93-95 HDR.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 17:44:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Paris
Info Church of Saint Augustin, Paris, France. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent play with the unavoidable distorsion. Very good, and I know the place ! --Jebulon (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose composition is not ideal for FP distracting foreground elements, awkward chandelier crop, and very strong wide-angle distortion reduce the overall visual balance. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Olfa Yakoubi --Tagooty (talk) 06:18, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good wide angle view in high quality.--Ermell (talk) 06:28, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support crop chairs in bottom, to start bellow first step, so chairs wont disturb and view is more clear. --Mile (talk) 07:19, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO opposing this for the perspective distortion is somewhat close-minded, sorry to say. Not every picture needs to be perspective-corrected to death. This picture instead chooses to highlight the perspective distortion as a feature to illustrate the imposing scale of the building, which is an entirely valid approach. Cmao20 (talk) 12:23, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assessment, Cmao20, but I think the motivation for the vote is not based on the picture itselft. I just realised that when I went through all current FP candidates yesterday morning I opposed the 2 noms of Olfa Yakoubi because none of them convinced me in terms of level of detail. The first edit he/she did afterwards was coming here to oppose this candidate (and second oppose in his FP record, what are the odds?). Definitely unfair but nothing unusual. Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Se que no podemos prevenir esto, pero al menos conmigo, votame todo lo negativo que puedas, nunca hare eso. Aunque a veces pudiera estar equivocado intento ser lo mas objetivo posible Wilfredor (talk) 14:56, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’m really disappointed and honestly hurt by your comment, Diego. Reading that my vote could be interpreted as revenge or retaliation was painful for me, because that is not how I participate in FP discussions at all.

I can’t imagine that you would think my oppose is related to the fact that you opposed some pictures I nominated — especially since this not even mine photo. I always try to give my opinion based on the image itself and according to my understanding of FP criteria, even when my opinion may differ from others.

I still don’t like the composition of this photo. In my opinion, the framing is not ideal, the foreground elements are distracting, and the brightness and distortion affect the overall visual balance. That is why I opposed it, and I still stand by my opinion sincerely and in good faith.

What hurt me the most is the implication that my opinion was dishonest or motivated by personal feelings. I respect your work and your contributions a lot. In fact, I have supported some of your photos before, and there are also photos of yours that I personally don’t like but chose not to oppose because I respect different artistic views and standards.

By the way, we already met before — I don’t know if you remember — and I genuinely appreciate your photography overall. That is also why this statement was painful for me to read. Even when we disagree on a nomination, I believe we should assume good faith and respect each other’s opinions.

And honestly, after reading your comment, I no longer feel comfortable voting on your photos in the future if my opinions are going to be interpreted this way instead of being seen as sincere photographic criticism.

For this specific picture, I simply do not think it reaches FP level, and my vote was made honestly, sincerely, and without any personal intention. Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 17:46, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I think that what Diego commented is not what he meant, remember that his level of English is not very good and he could use very direct or incorrect words, there is also the cultural difference. Wilfredor (talk) 19:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please Wilfredor, don't talk for me about what I meant or not. I don't think either, that you are the most appropiate person to judge my level of English. I meant what I wrote, because although I don't know Olfa Yokoubi, I've often seen this behavior very often in the almost last 20 years. That's why I wonder about the odds that the first edit after my 2 opposes is right away a decline here. Olfa, you will have to recognize that if my opposes didn't play a role in your oppose it looks at least suspicious. Still I'm happy to read that you confirm otherwise. Poco a poco (talk) 13:03, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your English is absolutely fine, Poco. Best to leave this whole nonsensical discussion. Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, Poco poco; it wasn't my place to interpret what you meant or judge your English. I'm sorry, it was a mistake on my part. I'll leave Wilfredor (talk) 14:45, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, Cmao20, let's move on Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Support The way the chairs are cut off at the bottom is a bit annoying; I would have cut it at the level of the stairs, but that's more of a personal decision than a technically valid one. The chandelier also obstructs the view of the dome, but I understand it's a necessary sacrifice since it's not something that can be removed. Thank you for this nomination. I have a similar one from another church, and I had my doubts about whether this type of composition would be accepted, but I agree that not all wide-angle distortion needs to be corrected, especially if the result would create a completely disproportionate image. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 13:13, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:48, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Olfa, great quality and the wide angle doesn't bother me much but the image does have distracting elements (chairs and chandelier) and I'm unconvinced by the crop. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:41, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Argiope lobata - 08-2025.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 18:32:37 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family_:_Araneidae_(Orb-weaver_Spiders)
Info created by Skander zarrad – uploaded by Skander zarrad – nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 18:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 20:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 04:22, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMHO Overexposed and lack of DoF and focus --Wilfredor (talk) 11:15, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback.

Really overexposed? I don't think so.

The depth of field is shallow, admittedly, but I think it's fine.

Thanks Skander zarrad (talk) 21:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I like the picture and it’s not strongly overexposed to the point of burning out the photo, but some areas could have more texture if they were slightly less bright. There’s a fine line between what is acceptable and what isn’t, so take this more as my personal opinion than as an absolute truth. In short, don’t take it too seriously. Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 18:11, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 06:21, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 04:13, 3 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common redshank (Tringa totanus) breeding Marken.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 17:09:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Tringa
Info Two current FPs, one and two. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Question Technically excellent, but I was recently told that FPC should be « the Best of Commons ». Should we have three « Best of Commons » pictures of the same bird ? --Jebulon (talk) 19:07, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
We do have a delist procedure, but not sure that is appropriate here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:35, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As they are different, I would keep 02 and this one; delist 01. --GRDN711 (talk) 05:50, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support No point punishing this picture because worse FPs exist of the same species Cmao20 (talk) 13:23, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. “Best of Commons” does not mean “the best photos of each subject” – for that we have got VI –, it means “the best images on Commons”. If we have 10 great and wonderful photos of species A and only 1 mediocre photo of species B, we can feature all 10 great photos of species A, if they are really great and are sufficiently different (showing different aspects/perspectives/poses/subspecies/… of species A), but must not feature the mediocre photo of species B; the latter should become a VI for species B, of course. – Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Best in the scope, hight quality, used on WP. Please fix the space color than look Uncalibrated --Wilfredor (talk) 21:54, 30 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:55, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

File:Small Minivet in Saswad August 2025 by Tisha Mukherjee 01.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 05:02:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Campephagidae_(Cuckooshrikes_and_allies)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:56, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Krigore (talk) 11:46, 26 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good composition, but detail below the bar for such perched birds. --Tagooty (talk) 06:38, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not very sharp compared to the standard for this type of bird photography in FPC, image heavily cropped or downsized compared to the size that the sensor delivers. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:10, 27 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks fine to me, and yes of course it is cropped, most wildlife photographs are...Cmao20 (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support The orange of the breast contrasts very pleasingly with the green background LetmeEditit (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition and colour contrast. Feather details appear a bit soft, but I guess we are spoiled a bit by the heavy AI sharpening many wildlife photographs use today and Tisha just did not apply such strong sharpening. So in the end the photo is possibly not softer, just less processed than other candidates. – Aristeas (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:41, 29 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Tabella dei periodi di voto per la regola del quinto giorno (5 giorni dopo la candidatura)

Fri 29 May → Wed 03 Jun
Sat 30 May → Thu 04 Jun
Sun 31 May → Fri 05 Jun
Mon 01 Jun → Sat 06 Jun
Tue 02 Jun → Sun 07 Jun
Wed 03 Jun → Mon 08 Jun

Tabella dei periodi di voto (9 giorni dopo la candidatura)

Mon 25 May → Wed 03 Jun
Tue 26 May → Thu 04 Jun
Wed 27 May → Fri 05 Jun
Thu 28 May → Sat 06 Jun
Fri 29 May → Sun 07 Jun
Sat 30 May → Mon 08 Jun
Sun 31 May → Tue 09 Jun
Mon 01 Jun → Wed 10 Jun
Tue 02 Jun → Thu 11 Jun
Wed 03 Jun → Fri 12 Jun