Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2026-1
| This is the log page of featured picture candidates from June 2026, part 1
Please do not edit the contents of this page or the individual nominations. This is an archive of past discussions. |
File:Црква „Св. Димитриј“ - Иловица 10.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2026 at 23:35:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:35, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:35, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 13:06, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 18:35, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:13, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:15, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 12:07, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 19:59, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment Да беше црно-бела, и свртена малко во лево, со кроп, супер ке беше. --Mile (talk) 13:33, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Kiril Simeonovski Да напрам Алтернативе ? --Mile (talk) 13:41, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- @PetarM: Предложив алтернатива. Слободно уредувај ја ако мислиш дека треба. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Kiril Simeonovski Да напрам Алтернативе ? --Mile (talk) 13:41, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice, and I prefer the colour version because of the delicate shades. One may call this little figurine kitsch, but that does not change the photographer’s duties: if photographing kitsch, we need to make the kitsch shine, and this is what this photo does with much success. – Aristeas (talk) 19:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:27, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but on reflection this just isn't FP to me. I find the lighting uninspiring and the subject very ordinary, in spite of good image quality. I would not have opposed if I had been the only person blocking a 5-day promotion, but now an alternative has been added, this nomination will run the full 9 days no matter what so I feel comfortable making my views known. Cmao20 (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]
Comment This is an alternative black-and-white version as suggested by Petar. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Mene poubo. --Mile (talk) 18:11, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per above. Cmao20 (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2026 at 21:49:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Malaconotidae_(Bushshrikes)
Info Southern boubou (Laniarius ferrugineus) female – created by Krigore – uploaded by Krigore – nominated by Krigore -- Krigore (talk) 21:49, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Krigore (talk) 21:49, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The bird's tail is cut off. -- Alexander Novikov (talk) 22:48, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Due to the aforementioned issue with the tail being cut, however, the photo deserves credit for having been taken with a phone! --Wilfredor (talk) 13:53, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but the cut-off tail is too significant a flaw for me to support, despite the image's positive qualities. Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Alexander Novikov and Cmao20 --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:33, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
File:Церковь Спаса Преображения утром.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 10:21:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info created by Елена Нечипоренко – uploaded by Елена Нечипоренко – nominated by Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 10:21, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
- Gallery line points to Commons:Featured pictures/Architecture, but that page does not exist on Commons. FPCBot cannot promote the image to a non-existent gallery, and the close link in the nomination would be redlinked. Wilfredor (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching my mistake! ~2026-31653-74 (talk) 15:45, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
- Gallery line points to Commons:Featured pictures/Architecture, but that page does not exist on Commons. FPCBot cannot promote the image to a non-existent gallery, and the close link in the nomination would be redlinked. Wilfredor (talk) 15:30, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support A bit tilt --Wilfredor (talk) 16:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice Юрий Д.К. 09:54, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support though some perspective correction would help. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:12, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing that out. I'll correct the perspective a bit later Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 13:18, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Neutral The reflection is not fully symmetrical, which weakens part of the visual impact, and the vegetation in the lower left corner is somewhat distracting --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support This photo was actually on my list of images to nominate Cmao20 (talk) 17:39, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Nature is reclaiming its rights...--JackyM59 (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:46, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:36, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:23, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:18, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:14, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
File:20220615 Anoecia corni.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2026 at 13:56:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Aphididae (Aphids)
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 13:56, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 13:56, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support —Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 03:14, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:50, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:54, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:33, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The left crop is tight but the right one is really distubing. You should either focus on the ants (cropping much more on the right) or show the whole thing. Poco a poco (talk) 09:07, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Poor crop, sorry. TheBritinator (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Support I don't mind the crop, it's not very noticeable when the ants grab so much attention LetmeEditit (talk) 16:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per Poco a poco and TheBritinator --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:53, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 06:14:59 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)
Info Red-knobbed coot (Fulica cristata) in Lake Sidi Boughaba, Kenitra Province, Morocco. No FPs of this species. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 06:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 06:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 06:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:54, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:43, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice light and reflections.
Comment @Tagooty: IMHO the image looks slightly tilted to the right. Could you try to rotate it by 2 degrees or so anticlockwise and check whether the result looks better or worse? No offence, just an idea. Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 13:18, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Thanks for your review. Per your suggestion, I tried ccw rotation by 1 and 2 degrees, but the ripples on the water appear slightly tilted. The original looks more natural to me. --Tagooty (talk) 15:10, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- OK, so keep it as it is. Thank you for trying it! – Aristeas (talk) 15:52, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Thanks for your review. Per your suggestion, I tried ccw rotation by 1 and 2 degrees, but the ripples on the water appear slightly tilted. The original looks more natural to me. --Tagooty (talk) 15:10, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:48, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
File:2013-10-31 01 (L-R) STAR CLIPPER - IMO 8915445, ROYAL CLIPPER - IMO 8712178 - Motril, Spain.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 18:31:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Sailing ships
Info (R-L) Star Clipper, a 4-masted barquentine, meets Royal Clipper, a 5-masted, square-rigged sailing ship, off the coast of Spain at Motril. There is an existing FP of the Royal Clipper but this image is considerably different. c|u|n by GRDN711 -- GRDN711 (talk) 18:31, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- GRDN711 (talk) 18:31, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice composition, beautiful light. Yann (talk) 18:39, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:18, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Good example of low image quality but hight wow factor --Wilfredor (talk) 19:47, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Skander zarrad (talk) 22:26, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:05, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 14:15, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful Cmao20 (talk) 17:39, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:32, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:47, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Jebulon (talk) 08:31, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support per Yann and Wilfredor. – Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Great light, but noise/detail are not at FP level Poco a poco (talk) 10:17, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:15, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support This is a good example for showcasing our own rules: an FPC should be technically perfect but it must have a wow effect. --Granada (talk) 04:43, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know if you read my comment but it was almost the same as what you wrote. Maybe our minds are connected Wilfredor (talk) 16:47, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2026 at 22:11:20 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Poland
Info created by Krigore – uploaded by Krigore – nominated by Krigore -- Krigore (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Krigore (talk) 22:11, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Heavy JPEG compression, 281 KB/MP and exif missing --Wilfredor (talk) 12:23, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this is an older photo and the EXIF data is missing. I might have the source material on one of the older drives in the basement; I'll look for it when I can. The photos were taken with a Canon EOS 600D; I composed the panorama from several shots taken with an 18-55 mm lens at its maximum focal length. Krigore (talk) 16:40, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- I added the camera information bassed on your comment. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you! Krigore (talk) 17:28, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- I added the camera information bassed on your comment. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice cityscape, with the contrast between the silhouetted highrise buildings and the mountain on thje left Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you! Krigore (talk) 16:41, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:13, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:43, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Weak support A bit soft, but very impressive. I guess this would be an excellent example for the people who advocate that FPC has become too much about pixel peeping and should recall the crucial role of the wow. Yours truly prefers to consider both perspectives, so my result is a weak support. – Aristeas (talk) 19:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose First glance is impressive. But regarding the low image height the technical quality is overall below the FP-standards.--Milseburg (talk) 20:41, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
File:Toujane paysage.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2026 at 21:13:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by Ovva olfa -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:13, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:13, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting shapes in the landscape Cmao20 (talk) 15:33, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:29, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:13, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Interesting but it lacks some wow, but my main reason to oppose is the low level of detail Poco a poco (talk) 09:05, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nice place with interesting shapes, but it lacks of sharpness at full size.--Jebulon (talk) 10:02, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Impressive and special landscape. Unfortunately a bit soft, but I have the impression that no sharpening was applied in post-processing, if we consider this it’s still OK for me. – Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support SAIDI Ismail (talk) 16:43, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2026 at 18:52:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Caricatures
Info created by Anonymous – uploaded by Fæ – nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 18:52, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 18:52, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Very famous in France, high resolution and very good quality. This is a very well known allegory for the hope for Equality, at the very beginning of the French Revolution between 1788 and 1791, say. I am afraid this is not really interesting for non-french or non-historian people here...--Jebulon (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:21, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 07:12, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support I would lighten the background. --Yann (talk) 12:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Done, I did from restored tiff file, look if is enough --Ezarateesteban 22:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking historic cartoon/caricature, very good reproduction. – Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:30, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:38, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
File:Mirador de la Fortaleza 2023-12-27.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 06:23:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary_Islands
Info: panoramic view from the Fortaleza viewpoint, Teide National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks for use free software, pano template in the description is missing --Wilfredor (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Strange that my vote is only 3rd support.... Юрий Д.К. 09:48, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support I find this view pretty epic Cmao20 (talk) 13:21, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:54, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:20, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:32, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:12, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
File:Црква „Св. Ѓорѓи“ - Турново.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 23:04:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#North Macedonia
Info All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:04, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment - Minor perspective correction needed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Done Perspective corrected. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:24, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- I wish it was sharper but still
Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for noting the (un)sharpness. I've uploaded a sharper version. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:44, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:49, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:34, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:20, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:18, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Lovely building. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 05:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 05:05:27 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Netherlands
Info Monumental stelp farmhouse Beslingadijk 15 in mound village Friens
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:05, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:05, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent motif, composition, and quality outweighs slightly dull light Cmao20 (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support A lovely composition of a peaceful place... -- JackyM59 (talk) 20:08, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:42, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:32, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Weird house. --Mile (talk) 09:00, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:33, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 13:22, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:35, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2026 at 07:18:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info created by Gzen92 – uploaded by Gzen92 – nominated by Gzen92 -- Gzen92 (talk) 07:18, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Gzen92 (talk) 07:18, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment Try to improve the crop to avoid the people at the borders --Ezarateesteban 11:54, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]
Comment: This is an alternative more cut off on the sides. Gzen92 (talk) 10:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Quality is OK, but the whole place is in shadow, and top and bottom crops are too short. Yann (talk) 12:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination
File:20260317 Hohenbergia stellata.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2026 at 11:27:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Order_:_Poales
Info created, uploaded and nominated by FlocciNivis -- FlocciNivis (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- FlocciNivis (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Hash contrast because the flash and 8.5 MP vs 24.3 MP native for NIKON D750 (35% of full resolution --Wilfredor (talk) 12:10, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- The image is a vertical crop from a horizontal original, containing no additional parts of the plant, but only surroundings. I cut out the rest because I found it uninteresting in editing -- FlocciNivis (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- I understand. My recommendation is to find a better composition and take the photo at a time with better light to avoid post-editing. Wilfredor (talk) 12:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- For me the high contrast works very well on this image and I don't think 8.5MP is bad for a macro shot -- FlocciNivis (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- I understand. My recommendation is to find a better composition and take the photo at a time with better light to avoid post-editing. Wilfredor (talk) 12:32, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- The image is a vertical crop from a horizontal original, containing no additional parts of the plant, but only surroundings. I cut out the rest because I found it uninteresting in editing -- FlocciNivis (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:42, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The flash makes the image unappealing in my eyes – Julian Lupyan (talk) 17:26, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:31, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:55, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Support I like it. --Petro Stelte (talk) 07:02, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 12:07:36 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Single_stained_glass_windows
Info Smiths' Window in the north aisle of the nave of Freiburg Minster, Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Anonymous master, around 1320. All by me.
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment - Horizontal perspective seems skewed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Done @Crisco 1492: Corrected, thanks for your review! --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support - Still slightly skewed at the top, but I think this meets the FP criteria. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:01, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 16:13, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:32, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Contrast is too harsh for me, but that is mainly personal preference. Cmao20 (talk) 17:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Like Cmao20 I think photographs of stained-glass windows are even better when they show also the surroundings (and not just black); but this one is so well done that it deserves support. – Aristeas (talk) 13:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:01, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:36, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:14, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:52, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
File:Side view of the Château de Chantilly with water reflection and blue sky Oise France.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2026 at 14:33:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Palaces#France
Info One other FP, from a very different angle. High quality as usual from Basile Morin; excellent composition and reflections. created by Basile Morin – uploaded by Basile Morin – nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment Blown highlight on the roof.--Jebulon (talk) 14:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- I do not consider this a problem. Slate tiles in bright, direct sunlight will actually look like this. I don't think it's right to artificially lower highlights if it isn't true to reality. Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Matter of taste I suppose. I miss some tiles. Let me think again before voting.--Jebulon (talk) 17:42, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- I do not consider this a problem. Slate tiles in bright, direct sunlight will actually look like this. I don't think it's right to artificially lower highlights if it isn't true to reality. Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Question heavy compression, 339 KB/MP and 51% of full resolution, likely cropped or downsized ? --Wilfredor (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- I am not sure why you are commenting this kind of thing on nearly every recent nomination on this page. The picture is probably cropped but I don't see why that is an issue. The file size seems roughly normal for an image of this resolution when compared to other FPs in the category and I cannot see any compression artefacts. Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your question. For FP, it's not enough for an image to simply look good; technical quality is also part of the evaluation. Cropping an image isn't necessarily a problem, but if a file has been compressed or significantly reduced in size, it's fair to ask if a better version exists. This helps encourage uploading images at the highest possible quality. Wilfredor (talk) 16:09, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Relying so heavily on file size as a metric does not seem to be a good way of evaluating technical quality. I see no actual issues. Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- I agree with you that visible quality is the most important thing, without a doubt. However, we judge phone images quite strictly for technical limitations such as noise, processing and compression. For consistency, I think it's also fair to ask technical questions about files from high-end cameras, especially when the uploaded image is well below the camera's native resolution. My question is simply if there is a better version. Wilfredor (talk) 16:45, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Relying so heavily on file size as a metric does not seem to be a good way of evaluating technical quality. I see no actual issues. Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- I am not sure why you are commenting this kind of thing on nearly every recent nomination on this page. The picture is probably cropped but I don't see why that is an issue. The file size seems roughly normal for an image of this resolution when compared to other FPs in the category and I cannot see any compression artefacts. Cmao20 (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Thank you very much, Cmao20, for the nomination. The picture is 6000 pixels large, and not heavily compressed. Weight is 7,62 Mb. -- Basile Morin (talk) 16:14, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks, Basile. Your values are correct; the file is approximately 6000 pixels wide and 7.62 MB. My question arose from comparing it to the native resolution of the EOS R5: 6001 × 3840 represents approximately 51% (half) of the camera's total 45 MP resolution, which isn't necessarily a problem. I agree that the file size alone doesn't indicate harmful compression if no artifacts are visible. My only remaining question was whether a higher-resolution version exists. Wilfredor (talk) 16:26, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- 8192 pixels => 6001 pixels is a decent crop, in my opinion. The current best Canon camera available on the market (EOS-1D X Mark III) has a maximum of 5472 pixels. The larger resolution of this one offers freedom to choose a convenient framing afterwards. Yes, I decided to focus the composition on the castle. -- Basile Morin (talk) 18:09, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Thank you Basile, after checking the numbers again, 7.62 MB for 23 MP can be consistent with a high-quality JPEG export so I withdraw the concern about heavy compression. My original question was based on calculs, but I see no clear evidence of harmful compression here Wilfredor (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- 8192 pixels => 6001 pixels is a decent crop, in my opinion. The current best Canon camera available on the market (EOS-1D X Mark III) has a maximum of 5472 pixels. The larger resolution of this one offers freedom to choose a convenient framing afterwards. Yes, I decided to focus the composition on the castle. -- Basile Morin (talk) 18:09, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:57, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support — ERcheck (talk). 01:15, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:27, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:34, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Because of the blown highlight on the roof, disturbing even in the water reflection.--Jebulon (talk) 09:58, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Looks OK for me Юрий Д.К. 09:46, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent view of the château, and I agree with Cmao20’s assessment of the highlights. Maybe the white balance could be fine-tuned – on my calibrated screen the image looks a tiny little bit purplish. – Aristeas (talk) 19:46, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 07:01, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
File:Wied il-Għasri 2025-05-05 (1).jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 06:24:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malta
Info:Wied il-Għasri sea canyon, Gozo; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:24, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:24, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice Motorola phone quality and thanks for use free software, just verify if is tilt --Wilfredor (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:00, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:57, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry but I'm not amazed. I miss the exit to the sea here (like in your recent FP, but would have prefered a much longer view like here). Furthermore, the level of detail is also good for a cell phone but borderline for FP. Poco a poco (talk) 08:52, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:29, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Support TheBritinator (talk) 14:41, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:59, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support For me the wow is in the lovely colours Cmao20 (talk) 13:21, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Very pretty example of the unique environment of Malta. I love the way the light ripples in the water LetmeEditit (talk) 16:23, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:48, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose per Poco; an aside: I would support featuring Poco's longer view, surprised it isn't already FP. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:11, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 15:42, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:57, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 18:53:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Caricatures
Info created by Anonymous – uploaded by Fæ – nominated by Ezarate --Ezarateesteban 11:17, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ezarateesteban 11:17, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Question The source file is smaller than the restored one, it is not clear to me what the source is or was some type of enlargement applied? --Wilfredor (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- File:Allegorie dèdiè au tiers etat LCCN2004676887.tif this is the source file to do restoration, I downloaded it in the webpage given in the description of jpg file --Ezarateesteban 11:57, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- If that's your source, it confirms my suspicions. I'd like to know why the restored version is larger—not the overall image size, because it was cropped, but the designs within it. Wilfredor (talk) 12:45, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- File:Allegorie dèdiè au tiers etat LCCN2004676887.tif this is the source file to do restoration, I downloaded it in the webpage given in the description of jpg file --Ezarateesteban 11:57, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- I use only GIMP without resize anything --Ezarateesteban 12:49, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- Cambiare mi voto a favor si corriges lo del tamano, no tiene mucho sentido que sea mas grande que la original, quizas algun error al guardar?. Abrazos Wilfredor (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
- Fijate ahora Wilfredor, sinceramente no se --Ezarateesteban 23:00, 27 May 2026 (UTC)
- Esta foto merece ser FP, intenta ver que pudo haber pasado, quizas usaste otra fuente? Wilfredor (talk) 22:49, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support very interesting and very good restaoration.--Jebulon (talk) 19:34, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment Like your other nomination, I would lighten the background. Yann (talk) 16:19, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Done tone curves improved --Ezarateesteban 22:37, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:54, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2026 at 14:53:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Geraniaceae
Info created by Smailtn – uploaded by Smailtn – nominated by TOUMOU -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- Bonjour, merci beaucoup SAIDI Ismail (talk) 15:14, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Très bien fait, peut-être avec un peu trop de réduction de bruit. --Wilfredor (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
- Bonjour, merci, Ok c'est fait SAIDI Ismail (talk) 10:25, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:50, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support for the composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:22, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 20:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:32, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Steven Sun (talk) 08:32, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 15:42:14 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Muridae (Murids)
Info created by Flickr user Charlie Marshall – uploaded by Юрий Д.К. – nominated by LetmeEditit -- LetmeEditit (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- LetmeEditit (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks for nomination, really interesting photo. Also widely used in Wikimedia projects. Юрий Д.К. 15:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow 17 pages on wiki are using it, Hight educational value, good quality, excellent composition --Wilfredor (talk) 16:34, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support. However, the file name is odd, does not describe the contents well, and should be changed. Cmao20 (talk) 17:43, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 19:19, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:46, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:55, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:31, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:32, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Weak support Cute and excellent composition. Would be even better if the photographer had avoided to apply such strong sharpening to the sharp areas and such strong denoising/smudging to the unsharp areas; that combination makes it look somewhat overprocessed. - Aristeas (talk) 13:30, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support, but agree with Aristeas. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:00, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:36, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 18:32, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:15, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Memorial Stones for the Citizens of Łódź, Poland, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2026 at 17:43:33 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Detailed view of some stones and their cast iron plaques.
-
A multitude of neatly arranged stones forms the pavement of Ulica Piotrkowska.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Monuments_and_memorials
Info Ulica Piotrkowska in Łódź (Poland) is paved with 16,890 personalized stones, each carrying the name of one of the city's inhabitants. The project was started in 2000 on the occasion of the turn of the millennium, and has since been expanded twice. The aim of this set is to illustrate the commemorative stones and their cast iron plaques both in detail and as repeated elements arranged in rows forming the surface of the street. All by me. --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Strong and consistent visual approach throughout the set. The selective focus works here as part of the memorial narrative rather than a technical limitation. Having visited Piotrkowska myself, I find the images particularly effective in conveying the reflective atmosphere of the site - the fading names and repetitive structure reinforce the sense of memory and quiet absence remarkably well. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:45, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Support I like this very much but
Comment I don’t understand the idea of a set. each is featurable IMO. in my humble opinion you should nominate one after the other…--Jebulon (talk) 19:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: Thank you, I actually wanted to nominate the images separately in the first place. However, I think a set nomination is suitable here, because both pictures show different aspects of the same subject, which I think is very helpful in explaining the artwork. The pavement, photographed at a "macroscopic" scale, visualizes the sheer amount of stones that it consists of. The other image shows how such a commemorative stone and its plaque look in detail. IMO, this also corresponds to what you might experience when you visit the location for the first time: at the first glance, you see that the pavement is made up of uncountable individualized stones; then you bow down and look at the single stones up close, reading the names inscribed in them -- at least this is what I did! :) --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 23:56, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Aciarium: : Thanks for answering. I understand you explanation. Jebulon (talk) 00:28, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Jebulon: Thank you, I actually wanted to nominate the images separately in the first place. However, I think a set nomination is suitable here, because both pictures show different aspects of the same subject, which I think is very helpful in explaining the artwork. The pavement, photographed at a "macroscopic" scale, visualizes the sheer amount of stones that it consists of. The other image shows how such a commemorative stone and its plaque look in detail. IMO, this also corresponds to what you might experience when you visit the location for the first time: at the first glance, you see that the pavement is made up of uncountable individualized stones; then you bow down and look at the single stones up close, reading the names inscribed in them -- at least this is what I did! :) --Aciarium ⚒ (talk) 23:56, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:18, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorr, but this is definitely not a valid set. I would support the right candidate if nominated separately. Poco a poco (talk) 08:56, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- « Definitely » ? Wow… Jebulon (talk) 09:45, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
- Why not? LetmeEditit (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
- LetmeEditit: Please, elaborate first which of the 4 criterias for a set you believe it's fulfilled here. In my opinion none. Poco a poco (talk) 10:13, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Support - I saw them some time ago and tried to take some photos, but yours are far better. Krigore (talk) 11:50, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment Unsure about the set – our set rules are quite narrow. Of course I would support each of them if nominated separately. – Aristeas (talk) 19:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support I support the second image :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Aciarium (Ping me if you consider nominating them as single images) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 07:00, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 21:02:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Genus_:_Madoqua_(Dik-diks)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:27, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 22:09, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:36, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:02, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:28, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Great! --Yann (talk) 09:34, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 13:34, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support! Wassimtalk 04:58, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Granada (talk) 06:13, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:57, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:47, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:16, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:59, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
File:Luxor is a city - Mohamed abdelzaher (2).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 21:55:56 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Egypt
Info created by Mohamed abdelzaher – uploaded by Mohamed abdelzaher – nominated by Feryall -- Feryall (talk) 21:55, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support The filename should however be changed to something meaningful --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I love the composition and colours, but at full size there are a lot of JPEG compression artefacts which badly compromise quality. Cmao20 (talk) 14:44, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Comment Compo is great by the image has been very severely downsized. 2,41 MB is a very small size for 45 Mpx. EXIF is lacking. What camera has been used? (Z 7/8/9 or D850 I assume) Please upload images with highest quality possible. Юрий Д.К. 15:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
File:087 Rosy-faced lovebird couple cuddling in Damaraland Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 20:54:51 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittacidae_(True_(African_and_New_World)_Parrots)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:54, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:54, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice & expressive (can't currently pixel peep, but I will check later 😉) JayCubby (talk) 21:01, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:27, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 21:32, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support it's love --Wilfredor (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:58, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 07:29, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:48, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:28, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Lovely. --Yann (talk) 09:34, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:56, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Granada (talk) 06:13, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:59, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 05:44, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 06:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:48, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 07:16, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 11:03, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2026 at 20:39:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Paris
Info Church of Saint Severin, Paris, France. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:39, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:39, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow and great quality Cmao20 (talk) 21:26, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:31, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 22:53, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 02:38, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support In such old buildings there is always the question: where are the true verticals. I guess you did it right. --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:06, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:30, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support Olfa Yakoubi -ألفة يعقوبي (talk) 13:29, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 16:57, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Granada (talk) 06:12, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:58, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Support --Petro Stelte (talk) 06:49, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Елена Нечипоренко (talk) 09:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)