User talk:Uoaei1

Archives

• Archive 2011 – 2014
• Archive Jan – Jun 2015
• Archive Jul – Dec 2015
• Archive Jan – Jun 2016
• Archive Jul – Dec 2016
• Archive Jan – Jun 2017
• Archive Jul – Dec 2017
• Archive Jan – Jun 2018
• Archive Jul – Dec 2018
• Archive Jan – Jun 2019
• Archive Jul – Dec 2019
• Archive 2020
• Archive 2021 – 2022

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kartause Gaming Kirche Dachreiter 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 15:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee A 20221021 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:12, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagus sylvatica Herbstlaub 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: Please add a category for the location. --XRay 06:54, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Vorhalle 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Vorhalle 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malus domestica Mitterbach 20221027 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC) The picture is good but I'm not sure about the composition --Fabian Roudra Baroi 08:41, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wien Zentralfriedhof Allee A 20221021 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagus sylvatica Herbstlaub 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:33, 10 January 2023 (UTC) The color contrast kind of make eyes uncomfortable, also there's no clear focus point because of the composition. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 07:42, 10 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 08:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Valo139 21:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Melk Westseite 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Melk Westseite 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wachau vom Gochelberg 20220519 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wachau vom Gochelberg 20220519 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz Westseite 02a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Burg Hochosterwitz Westseite 02a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Burg Hochosterwitz Westseite 02a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polygonia c-album auf Hagebutte 20221028 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polygonia c-album auf Hagebutte 20221028 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:21, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
• 
• 

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/3 Views of Clam Castle, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/3 Views of Clam Castle, has been promoted. Thank you very much for your contribution! If you would like to nominate another set, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polygonia c-album auf Hagebutte 20221028 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Kreuzigungsgruppe 02.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marmota marmota Tauerntal 20220816 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Festung Nordseite 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20230607 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Hellbrunner Allee 20230607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:20, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche St. Peter Turm vom Festungsberg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:56, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20230607 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche St. Peter Turm vom Festungsberg 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Franziskanerkirche 20230607 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Schloss Freisaal 20230607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus avium subsp. duracina Blüten 20230423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Tournasol7 04:21, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Harter Bach 20230506.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Franziskanerkirche 20230607 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:24, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Innenraum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Innenraum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Franziskanerkirche Turm 20230607.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Schlosspark Hellbrunn Nebengebäude 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Schlosspark Hellbrunn Nebengebäude 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Sörger Wasserfall 20230506 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:26, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Saal Dom Südseite 20230507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Längsee 20230714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Längsee 20230713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:10, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kosiak - Wertatscha 20230714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kosiak Panorama SSW 20230714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 14:27, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Sörger Wasserfall 20230506 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:43, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebenfels Sörger Wasserfall 20230506 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 06:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kosiak - Wertatscha, Bielschitza, Hochstuhl 20230714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 11:06, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kosiak - Wertatscha 20230714.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kosiak - Wertatscha 20230714.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Längsee 20230716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiener Secessionsgebäude Kuppel Blattwerk 20230811 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiener Secessionsgebäude Kuppel 20230811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiener Secessionsgebäude Ver Sacrum 20230811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiener Secessionsgebäude Wahlspruch 20230811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiener Secessionsgebäude Gorgonen 20230811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiener Secessionsgebäude Kuppel Blattwerk 20230811 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurter Hütte - Panorama SSO 20230714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klagenfurter Hütte - Bielschitza 20230714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Innenraum 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Innenraum 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilika Seckau - choir.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basilika Seckau - nave viewing eastwards to the altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 16 December 2023 (UTC)

Fröhliche Weihnachten!

Friedvolle Weihnachten und ein gesundes, glückliches neues Jahr 2024! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:48, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Herzliche Grüße und danke für Deine wunderbaren Fotos!

✴ Happy Holidays, Uoaei1 ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wiener Secessionsgebäude Kuppel Blattwerk 20230811 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wiener Secessionsgebäude Kuppel Blattwerk 20230811 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kosiak - Edelweißspitze, Klagenfurter Spitze 20230714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weißenkirchen Kirche 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 15:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rossatz Rührsdorfer Rotes Kreuz 20240501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Remontees 22:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mitterbach Gemeindealpe Panorama West 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mitterbach Gemeindealpe Panorama West 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulrichsberg Panorama SSO 20240704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 14:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Gemeindealpe Panorama Südost 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 11:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitzer See Südwest 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 06:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallnitz Stappitzer See Südwest 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice composition. Good quality. --Augustgeyler 06:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscher Südseite 20240102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice winter landscape and good quality. --ArildV 07:15, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)

Red line in File:Echeveria A7CR 02866-90 zsp.jpg

Thanks for pointing this out, you are remarkably sharp sighted! On studying the separate images used in the focus stacking, I found a microscopic reddish bug (?) that was moving across the leaf during the shooting. The focus stacking software converted this into a line. I've cloned it out in the new version. Tagooty (talk) 09:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Kloster 20240615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Göttweig 20230810 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kartause Gaming Laterne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:41, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Innenraum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langenlois Kirche Flügelaltar Katharina 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak support  Support, obvious sharper in the bottom than the other and yesterdays' --Michielverbeek 04:03, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Göttweig 20230810 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:26, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Innenraum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)  Support Very good --FBilula 11:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Traunstein Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ulrichsberg Panorama SSO 20240704.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ulrichsberg Panorama SSO 20240704.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20240728 Gold P.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and informative. --Milseburg 13:30, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kartause Gaming Laterne 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kartause Gaming Laterne 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20240728 Blau P.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:15, 20 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cephalanthera rubra Ulrichsberg 20240704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Franziskanerkirche Hochaltar Pacher-Madonna 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiten Pfarrkirche Durchfahrt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:02, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiten Pfarrkirche Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiten Pfarrkirche Apsisfenster L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:14, 23 September 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:15, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Franziskanerkirche Hochaltar Pacher-Madonna 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiten Pfarrkirche Apsisfenster R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weiten Pfarrkirche Martinsaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:27, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulrichsberg Kirchenruine 20240704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz Nordseite 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)  Support Very nice --FBilula 18:22, 24 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langenlois Kirche Flügelaltar Barbara 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bad Traunstein Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bad Traunstein Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Gnadenstatue 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:07, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Portal Tympanon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:11, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Apsisfenster L 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Katharinenaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:08, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Gnadenstatue 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz Nordseite 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Portal Tympanon 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:34, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Apsisfenster R 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cephalanthera rubra Ulrichsberg 20240704.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cephalanthera rubra Ulrichsberg 20240704.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Set Promoted to FP

• 
• 

★ This set has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The set Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20240728 P, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20240728 P, has been promoted. Thank you very much for your contribution! If you would like to nominate another set, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Göttweig 20230810 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Göttweig 20230810 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Burg Hochosterwitz Nordseite 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Burg Hochosterwitz Nordseite 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2024 - Gratulation!

Hallo Uoaei1,
danke für deine Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation! Du hast damit den 8. Platz in der Hauptkategorie WikiDaheim mit File:Kartause Gaming Laterne 01.jpg gewonnen.

Du erhältst in Kürze von uns noch eine Mail mit den genaueren Infos zu den Preisen. Die Galerie aller Gewinnerbilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien ist hier zu finden.

Herzliche Grüße, –-Christian Philipp (WMAT) (talk) 22:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

	* Happy Holidays! *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Dear George, thank you very much for your Christmas greetings. I also wish you the very best, and a peaceful Christmas and new year for you and your country! --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:24, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Schöne Feiertage und einen guten Rutsch!

	✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴
	Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! ✴ Hallo Uoaei1, ganz herzlichen Dank für die großartigen Fotos, die Du auch im vergangenen Jahr hier hochgeladen hast – sie sind eine echte Bereicherung für Wikimedia Commons! Alles Gute wünscht Dir für das neue Jahr 2025 Aristeas (talk) 16:34, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
	✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

Danke, Aristeas, für die Weihnachts- und Neujahrswünsche! Ich wünsche dir ebenfalls ein erfolgreiches neues Jahr mit vielen tollen Fotos! --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Schönbach Kirche Innenraum 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schönbach Kirche Innenraum 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20240728 Gold Z.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Altstadt Panorama 20240728 Blau Z.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salzburg Stiftskirche Nonnberg Hochaltar Predella 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 13:16, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langenlois Kirche Flügelaltar 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 12:59, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obir-Tropfsteinhöhle Haifischmaul Sintersee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 18 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obir-Tropfsteinhöhle Lange Grotte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:16, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obir-Tropfsteinhöhle Orgel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:15, 17 August 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 20 August 2025 (UTC)

Hallo lieber Uoaei1,

Ich möchte dich kontaktieren für eine Frage, weiß aber nicht wie.

Kannst du mir vielleicht ein email schicken?

schonok (@) protonmail.com als Adresse. Danke Bilouloukou (talk) 08:47, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

@Bilouloukou, warum stellst du die Frage nicht einfach hier? Uoaei1 (talk) 10:38, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Ok. Ich möchte dein Foto verwenden vom Orgel in Stift Ardagger, ich mache ein Video für ein Festival und konnte an dem Tag, wo ich gefilmt habe, keine gute Bilder bekommen, weil es so viel Gegenlicht gab. Dein Foto würde mir sehr helfen, das Video wie erwünscht fertigzustellen. Nur, im ganzem Video gibt's keine Credits nirgendwo, daher die Frage: wäre es ok, wenn ich die Foto verwende, ohne Credits? Wenn nicht, würde ich lieber deinen echten Namen angeben ganz am Ende vom Film.

Sag mir Bescheid, dass wir eine Lösung finden, die für alle passt.

GlG Bilouloukou (talk) 10:53, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

@Bilouloukou Danke dass du es so genau nimmst. Schreib bitte einfach "Wikimedia Commons Uoaei1", das reicht. LG. Uoaei1 (talk) 14:47, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

Passt, mache ich genau so dann. Danke und alles Gute! Bilouloukou (talk) 19:04, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Obir-Tropfsteinhöhle Haifischmaul Sintersee 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Obir-Tropfsteinhöhle Haifischmaul Sintersee 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 August 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obir-Tropfsteinhöhle Indische Grotte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:30, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obir-Tropfsteinhöhle Orgel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Obir-Tropfsteinhöhle Indische Grotte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar Himmelfahrt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:54, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar Pfingsten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:12, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar Marientod 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:05, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar Erscheinung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:05, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar Schrein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:05, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:24, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster Detail 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:24, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar Marienkrönung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:17, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar Abschied 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:00, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Anna-Altar Schrein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 06:00, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Traunstein Kirche Innenraum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:59, 11 September 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:46, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Traunstein Kirche Innenraum 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:59, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Jungfrauen-Altar Schrein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:59, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar Marienbegräbnis 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:17, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schönbach Kirche Hochaltar Aufnahme 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:17, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 14 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Christus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 11:45, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Sebastian 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 11:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Bartholomäus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 11:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 11:35, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 11:41, 12 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 15 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster Dämon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:55, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavant St. Ulrich 20250702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavant St. Ulrich Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavant St. Ulrich Deckenfresko Mariä Himmelfahrt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:43, 17 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster Götzenverweigerung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster Ruten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:15, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar 05a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:23, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Schrein 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster Drache 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:44, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Orgel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Elisabethaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Kanzel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:29, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berg im Drautal St. Athanasius 20250702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 05:08, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Madonna 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Orgel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:13, 22 September 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 08:36, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Kanzel 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:15, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Ecce homo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:13, 22 September 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:15, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Verurteilung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:13, 22 September 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:15, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg 20250702 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:13, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster Wasser 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:27, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Schrein 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langenlois Kirche Innenraum 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langenlois Kirche Flügelaltar 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:35, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster Enthauptung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 07:58, 24 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Kreuzabnahme 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:14, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Schweißtuch 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:14, 25 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Grablegung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:52, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Kreuzigung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavant St. Ulrich Innenraum 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:42, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavant St. Peter und Paul Hochaltar Paulus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:45, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavant St. Peter und Paul Hochaltar Petrus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:45, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Orgel 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Orgel 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Rojach Kirche Flügelaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:00, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz 20250705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:00, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Fresko Johannes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:00, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Bartholomäus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:39, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Assling St. Korbinian Innenraum 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:39, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Christus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Sebastian 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:50, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar Sebastian 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osterwitz St. Sebastian 20250705 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC) Sorry, I disagree. The foliage on the left should be removed and less sky with a crop on the right would move the church to a better focus. --Syntaxys 07:36, 1 October 2025 (UTC) @Syntaxys:  Done --Uoaei1 14:21, 1 October 2025 (UTC)  Support pro QI, scenery (now) well balanced --2015 Michael 2015 20:49, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osterwitz St. Sebastian 20250705 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:54, 2 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 06:48, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar Katharina und Barbara 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:53, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar Dorothea und Margarethe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:53, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg 20250702 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:53, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg 20250702 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:36, 1 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ziv 23:27, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar Katharina und Barbara 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Fresko Bartholomäus und Thaddäus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar Dorothea und Margarethe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC) I would try to balance the brightness gradient 1/3 at the top and 1/3 at the bottom; the middle is fine. This should be no problem with a gradient mask. --Syntaxys 05:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC) @Jakubhal:  Done, thanks for the hint --Uoaei1 05:25, 6 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality, that's better --Syntaxys 12:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard 20250702 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:07, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:24, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Fresko Pfingsten und Pantokrator 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:18, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar Leonhard 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar Laurentius 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:19, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Arc d'Orange SE 20250627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Fresko Grablegung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:11, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Christus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar Christophorus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Fresko Leonhardslegende Messe 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Orgel 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:21, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Théâtre Antique 20250627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 11:34, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Arc d'Orange NNW 20250627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard 20250702 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg Hochosterwitz und Kobesser 20250705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:10, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar Erasmus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:56, 8 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Harmonide 12:53, 8 October 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Dev Jadiya 06:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Elisabethaltar Schrein 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:58, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Elisabethaltar Urban 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:37, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Arc d'Orange E 20250627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:17, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Fresko Kreuzigung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 05:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Bartholomäus 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:48, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pulkau Heilig-Blut-Kirche Flügelaltar Sebastian 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Famberhorst 04:30, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Elisabethaltar Goar 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:26, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Fresko Leonhardslegende Acker 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Arc d'Orange N 20250627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Arc d'Orange ENE 20250627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not really detailed in bottom, but I don't think there are interesting details in the bottom so for me good enough for QI --Michielverbeek 05:17, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Fresko Leonhardslegende Chlodwig 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:22, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Elisabethaltar Bettler 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qua;ity --Michielverbeek 05:19, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Elisabethaltar Marienkrönung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:22, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langenlois Kirche Flügelaltar nicht identifizierte Heilige R01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Arc d'Orange NE 20250627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Elisabethaltar Krankenheilung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2025 – Gratulation!

Hallo Uoaei1,
danke für deine Beiträge zu WikiDaheim und Gratulation! Du hast damit einige Platzierungen erreicht und wir gratulieren also

• zum 5. Platz in der Denkmalkategorie mit File:Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster Detail 01.jpg sowie
• zum 10. Platz in der Denkmalkategorie mit File:Lavant St. Ulrich 20250702.jpg!

Die Galerie aller Gewinnerbilder in den verschiedenen Kategorien ist hier zu finden.

Herzliche Grüße, Raphael Mair (WMAT) (talk) 11:26, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays! * 2026 !

	* Happy Holidays! *
	Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Joyeux Noël et bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches Neues Jahr! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Щасливого Різдва i з Новим роком! Boldog karácsonyt és boldog új évet! Καλά Χριστούγεννα και καλή χρονιά!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:49, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

...and a Happy New Year.

Warm greetings from Italy. Terragio67 (talk) 17:03, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Fröhliche Weihnachten!

Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches, gesundes Neues Jahr 2026! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Schöne Feiertage!

✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴
	Frohe Weihnachten und einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr! ✴ Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴

Happy holidays and best wishes for 2026!

✨ Happy Holidays Uoaei1! 🎄 Merry Christmas! 🎉 Best wishes for 2026! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:04, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Presentation of Jesus at the Temple (Schönbach, Niederösterreich) - Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 06:43, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hochaltar Schönbach − total view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:41, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flügelaltar Pulkau − total view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope, very detailed --Gower (talk) 10:53, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pfarrkirche hl. Stephanus Eggenburg - Elisabethaltar − total view with open wings.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:44, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flügelaltar Langenlois − total view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Pierre André ^(talk) 22:00, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kirche Maria Rojach - Flügelaltar − total view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:30, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of Catholic church St. Laurentius (Langenlois) − east view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Ulrich (Lavant) − east view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Gower (talk) 13:29, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interior of St. Ulrich (Lavant) − altars.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:16, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Langenlois Kirche Flügelaltar 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Langenlois Kirche Flügelaltar 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pfarrkirche hl. Stephanus (Eggenburg) - Gothic pulpit − southeast view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:37, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pfarrkirche hl. Stephanus (Eggenburg) - Gothic pulpit − southwest view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:08, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pfarrkirche Zwickenberg - Flügelaltar − total view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and used --Pierre André ^(talk) 16:15, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:41, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster Detail 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Ardagger Kirche Margaretenfenster Detail 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyles euphorbiae Raupe 20250709 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 14:48, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Elisabethaltar Kruzifix-Wunder 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:53, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langenlois Kirche Flügelaltar Dorothea 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plasmium 09:26, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Orgel 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Orgel 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyles euphorbiae Raupe 20250709 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ROCKY 03:31, 3 May 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poro26 19:32, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:52, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pernegg Herbstwald 20251116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.Great atmosphere --JackyM59 10:38, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Arc d'Orange SSE 20250627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:11, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Perchtoldsdorf Pfarrkirche Josefsfenster 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Perchtoldsdorf Pfarrkirche Josefsfenster 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (15 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langenlois Kirche Flügelaltar Barbara 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:57, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eggenburg Pfarrkirche Elisabethaltar Gottesbegegnung 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 04:49, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langenlois Kirche Flügelaltar nicht identifizierte Heilige L01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 13:01, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Morgenröte 20231029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 05:36, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Théâtre Antique Augustus 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Arc d'Orange Gewölbe 20250627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:17, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Zwickenberg St. Leonhard Flügelaltar 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Hyles euphorbiae Raupe 20250709 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hyles euphorbiae Raupe 20250709 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Théâtre Antique Augustus 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orange Arc d'Orange Relief NNW L 20250627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spermophilus citellus Hirschstetten 20240720 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:27, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Freiburg Münster linkes Seitenschiff Schmiedefenster 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Freiburg Münster linkes Seitenschiff Schmiedefenster 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Wilfredor (talk) 10:55, 30 May 2026 (UTC)